KING CRIMSON: RED (1974)
1) Red;
2) Fallen Angel; 3) One More Red Nightmare; 4)
Providence; 5) Starless.
General verdict: Red.
The sheer fact that Red even exists is a bit of a miracle — much less the slightly more
arguable fact that Red is not only
the best of the three albums that the Wetton-Bruford lineup of KC produced in
between 1973 and 1974, but one of the two or three best KC albums, period. By
mid-'74, prog rock itself was in heavy trouble, quickly losing its commercial and
critical appeal; and so was King Crimson, whose members had once again begun to
fall off one by one — Jamie Muir leading the way, and David Cross eventually
following suit (his playing is still featured on the live take of ʽProvidenceʼ
captured here). Eventually, even Fripp caught the bug, and, just a few days
before the sessions took off, got entangled in the mystical teachings of John
G. Bennett and George Gurdjieff... anything goes, I guess, when you want to
find yourself an excuse not to go and
do your duties with your own band.
Perhaps Robert is just a tiny bit less
creative on Red than he is on Larks' Tongues (at least there are
fewer guitar solos), but Wetton and Bruford were still more than happy to
compensate, on their own as well as bringing in some session musicians to fill
out the sound — most notably, a whole bunch of brass players, including past
members Mel Collins and Ian McDonald, as well as Mark Charig on cornet, Robin
Miller on oboe, and an uncredited person playing the cello on ʽStarlessʼ.
Wetton, rumor has it, was already inclined to push King Crimson in a more
commercial direction — he himself admitted that his invitation of Ian to take
part in the sessions was part of his plan to push the band into Pink Floyd
territory, what with Dark Side Of The
Moon looking like a perfect compromise between artistic self-expression and
popularity — and you can feel tiny shades of «commercialism» on at least
ʽFallen Angelʼ and ʽOne More Red Nightmareʼ; but with Fripp and Bruford as the
other two cornerstones of the sound, there was clearly no talk of crafting
complex pop hits. Instead, they set out to create... a Leviathan!
Okay, the simplest thing in the world would
be to call Red a «dark, brooding, apocalyptic vision of an
album» and end it right there. Nobody could really seriously deny this anyway,
and people who truly love music usually tend to love dark-brooding-apocalyptic,
so that's that. The trick is that Red is also a King Crimson
album; and ever since it was made obvious that Robert Fripp was King
Crimson, and everybody else was just serving a certain amount of time in His
Majesty's Government, it also became obvious that no King Crimson album would
ever comfortably fit a simple, one-line definition. For one thing, Fripp hardly
comes across as an overtly gloomy, fatalistic kind of guy: even when everything
really begins to fall apart and the Four Horsemen appear on the horizon, he
will still be sitting on his little stool, immaculately dressed and immersed in
composing a last-minute soundtrack to events in a parallel universe. For
another thing, ever since the original King Crimson dissipated and the band
freed itself from the operatic nature of Greg Lake's voice and the cosmic
depths of Ian McDonald's Mellotron, KC music was rarely, if ever, about the
grand open spaces and large-scale cataclysms — on the contrary, it became
deeply introverted, with a sort of «anti-arena rock» vibe where the music could
kick as much ass as any stadium anthem, but stay all the time «within you»
rather than «without you». To that end, Red burns hot and
bright, but with a strange, inner flame, where you have to enter the furnace
and politely close, lock, and bolt the door behind you before you get the right
to properly feel the burn.
Take the title track, for instance, probably
the heaviest rocker of King Crimson's entire early and mid-period (and one that
still proudly stood its ground even after 1994, when the band began getting
real heavy once again). From the very first seconds, its heaviness
is undermined by the odd, thin, whiny tone of the lead guitar, playing the
opening riff three times in a row, each time higher and higher until the pitch
gets dangerously close to ultrasound level. This is not a glam-rock /
arena-rock kind of thing, nor is it a Black Sabbath kind of crunch, nor is this
a merger of psychedelia and hard rock in a Hawkwind way — this is the
soundtrack to your local mental strain, the sound of your brain as it
encounters a threatening, potentially lethal challenge and begins to run in
circles, trying, now in a collected and logical manner, now in a total panic,
to circumvent it. Like its immediate predecessors, Red is often
quoted among the progenitors of math-rock, and ʻRedʼ is, indeed, the
perfect early math-rock composition, where the main riff sounds like somebody trapped
in a labyrinth, making one attempt after another to get out of it, to break
some invisible barrier with a set of well-calculated moves. Around 2:50 into
the song comes a temporary breakdown, as logic gets replaced by panic; but the
panic attack is brief, and eventually, we get back to the algorithm, and when
the opening theme returns in coda form, you got your light at the end of the
tunnel. Too bad the video era was not yet upon us: ʻRedʼ just screams for
an accompanying animation of a suspenseful journey through dark tunnels and
treacherous warp holes (just like ʽTalking Drumʼ requests the animation of
falling down in an elevator to Hell). This is not just psychedelic chaos
like the one generated by early Pink Floyd or classic Amon Düül II — this is an
ambitious stab at a rational representation of your darkest subconscious, an
amazing combination of instinctive dread-'n'-doom with meticulous planning and
logical analysis, and, might I add, one that you rarely, if ever, find these
days even with the best «math-rock» ensembles.
The two vocal tracks that follow are almost
obligatorily weaker, mainly because they have vocals — and,
for that matter, I am not sure if the tendency to mix Wetton's voice so
strangely was purely accidental, or if Fripp expressly meant to keep the
powerful vocalist in the aisles rather than upfront, in order to avoid falling
back onto the operatic style of Greg Lake. Not only that, but the lyrics
to ʻFallen Angelʼ would have probably fit in much better on a Thin
Lizzy album, with a morbid tale of two brothers not faring well in New York
City's gangland that could have hardly been farther removed from whatever was
going through Robert's mind at the time — but this is merely to reinforce the
idea that the last thing that matters on a King Crimson album are the words,
particularly after they had parted ways with Sinfield. What does matter here is the contrast between
the main balladeering theme, almost peacefully pastoral with its oboe and
cornet overdubs, and the jazzy chorus / bridge sections, where Fripp's nagging
guitar part, like an alarm signal gone wrong, is intertwined with free-form jazz
brass soloing, which I probably could not have tolerated if it were on a jazz
record; but together with that guitar part, the effect is strangely oppressive
and haunting. You will hardly remember this tune as a passionate social
statement, but if you give it a good chance, you will always remember it as a
mesmerizing duel between moments of inner peace and psychic turbulence (not to
mention the last time ever you will hear Robert Fripp play a bit of acoustic
guitar).
The lyrics are a tad better on ʻOne More
Red Nightmareʼ, which is, contrary to desirable associations, not about
John Wetton preventing a communist plot to kidnap Robert Fripp and appoint him
head of the Moscow Symphony Orchestra, but rather about the protagonist's fear
of flying — again, the word "red" implies a subconscious flashing
alarm signal, and the track does feature the most psychotic verse melody on the
entire album, although most of it is given over to a slower, subtler section
that merges... heck if I really know what it merges: folk-rock guitar patterns,
crazyass time signatures, and a sax part from Ian McDonald that is more R&B
than jazz in nature. However, the opening riff again returns us to the
math-rock territory of ʻRedʼ, like a conundrum waiting to be solved, and
so, once more, we get the impression of an entrapped spirit trying to break
free — caught in a "red nightmare" that is so endless, the only way
to get rid of it is to abruptly cut the track around 7:09, the same way the
Beatles did with ʻI Want You (She's So Heavy)ʼ five years before.
The second side of the album consists of but
two tracks, heavy on jam power, and while many people (myself included) tend to
regard the live improv ʻProvidenceʼ as a piece of filler that lacks
focus and a sense of purpose compared to the other tracks, I cannot help
admitting that, atmosphere-wise, it fits in perfectly with the rest — same
psychodarkness all over the place, with Fripp's high-pitched guitar tones,
Wetton's thick metallic bass grumbles, Bruford's poly-frickin'-rhythms, and
David Cross's excruciating violin warbles. All that is really needed is some sort
of memorable theme to complete the package — but once you get to the juicy part
when the "Power Trio" begins unwrapping its potential in earnest
(rather than just chilling and waiting for Cross to finish torturing his
violin), even that is forgotten. However, on the whole, the "one more red
nightmare" of ʻProvidenceʼ is really just a big introduction to the
album's magnum opus — ʻStarlessʼ, formerly ʻStarless
And Bible Blackʼ before Fripp, out of his usual contrariness, decided to give
that title to another composition and put it on another album.
It is fairly clear why Fripp disliked the
song originally — Wetton's vocal delivery again borders on operatic, and the
lyrical message of depression and desperation is not far removed from whatever
territory the band had already covered with ʻEpitaphʼ, a stage that Fripp
thought was already completed. But in the end, he did like it enough to throw
on an almost nostalgic Mellotron part, and invent a guitar part for the main
melody that sounds like the weeping song of an alien... or, rather, of the
little green man deep inside your brain, who only gets activated late at night
("starless and bible black", see). And he compensated for everything
with the last seven minutes of the tune — of course, that slow, diligently
conducted crescendo is one of the most stunning moments in King Crimson
history, with the gradually ascending guitar leading the rhythm section on and
on, higher and higher, until you just can't take it any longer. I have a hard
time trying to come up with a better example of psychic tension, where the
spirit inevitably winds itself to breaking point, anywhere in rock music.
In the end, it's not about the end of the
world, and it's not even about insanity (another favorite subject in art rock),
but it is about the hidden manoeuvres of the subconscious, and
how there's order in its chaos and chaos in its order — something like that
(even though I am still searching for a way to state that better) has always
been my impression of Red, and, for that matter, the majority of
King Crimson's material both in the 1973-74 and in the later (though not
earlier) periods. If it does not make much sense to you, this does not exactly
surprise me, because records like these are unique — they don't really let you
apply the usual cliches about depression, desolation, darkness, and
destitution.
Of course, not every second of Red should
necessarily leave the listener with a wide-open jaw, and pretty much every
single track here, I think, is at least a tad overstretched: I would see no
harm in trimming some fat off the sax jams in ʻOne More Red Nightmareʼ, in
limiting Cross' time with the violin on ʻProvidenceʼ, and maybe even in
cutting off a minute or so off the title track (the main riff is so
instantaneously catchy anyway that replaying it over and over adds little to
the initially accumulated awesomeness). However, this would only make sense in
order to accommodate at least one or two other tracks of equal
caliber, provided they had them — and if they didn't, there's no harm in a
little bit of padding. I do have to say, though, that I am a
little disappointed in ʻStarlessʼ after the crescendo — that passage
is so intense that the only thing it could have successfully resolved itself
into would be a mega-monstruous jam at the top of the trio's insane powers,
something worthy of a ʻ21st Century Schizoid Manʼ at least, and,
well, there's a little bit of that, but not enough for my taste — we really
needed a shattering, staggering coda, and instead of that, the whole album just
kind of fizzles out at the end.
It is a little ironic, but telling, that most
of the color of the front sleeve of Red is not red at all, but
black — with only the title flashing red at the top. For 1974's King Crimson,
"red" is above all a signal, a blinking warning light in the
darkness, perhaps a survival mechanism that ignites in times of direst need,
and this is what they are exploring — they do not even care if the activated
mechanism leads to salvation or not, they are just interested in documenting
the bloody struggle, and they document it with such unique musical means that
you can never really tell where exactly the struggle takes place: in this
world? in another world? outside your mind? inside your mind? All I know is,
this is a perfect record for sitting and brooding alone on a dark, tense
evening when your mind is not at peace and is in desperate need of a same-spirited
companion. It may not be the most innovative or musically expansive record in
King Crimson's catalog, but it certainly is the one King Crimson album that
burrows the deepest, penetrates the most remote corners of your brain, and
stimulates them in, I might say, an almost perverse fashion at times - then
again, what else should one expect from a British gentleman as clean and
well-behaved as Mr. Robert Fripp?..
Technical note: as with most of King
Crimson's catalog, Red was treated to a whole series of
remasterings and re-releases, the latest of which featured a complete remix
(first in 5.1, then in proper stereo) by Steven Wilson of Porcupine Tree (I
have the 2013 edition with the original and the re-mix, but still haven't
gotten around to properly comparing the two — not that I'm that much of an
audiophile, but Wetton's vocals do sound somewhat cavernous on the original).
And, of course, for true loyalists there's always The Road To Red —
a mammoth 24-CD set that contains soundboard recordings of pretty much every
single show (or, at least, the vast majority of them) that the band played on
their final tour, even if, as it has already been said, the only composition
from Red to have been played on that tour was ʻStarlessʼ.
Of course, you cannot call yourself a true fan unless you have memorized every
single disc of that one (or owned the complete King Crimson catalog on CD, for
that matter, which can only be done if you throw out your partner to make
enough space for all the discs).
Would not add or subtract anything said about this legendary album. But I am glad you mentioned Steven Wilson and his Porcupine Tree.
ReplyDeleteIt's about time to pinpoint his place on the map of contemporary music: Is he the real modern prog master, or just a clever creator of tasty neo-prog pablum?
He is a master of COPY-PASTE in prog music (is it still prog? I don't think so). You see his TIME FLIES = Floyd's DOGS, his WATCHMAKER = Genesis' Musical Box. But I have to admitt he does have great ears for those 5.1 mixes. Just bought his 5.1 mix of Jethro Tull's Heavy Horses - Amazing !!!
DeleteAdam, I am afraid that he is much more complex.
DeleteThe elevator to Hell is a rather appropriate image for "The Talking Drum", and I don't think that John McFerrin would mind a passing credit for it.
ReplyDeleteIt’s been said before, but I’m not sure what George is on about when he says that Starless just “fizzles out” at the end. That climatic, romantic mellotron swell at the end and stately reprise of the main theme on alto sax is about as perfect an ending as one could ask for.
ReplyDeleteI would literally consider that ending the most climactic in all of rock music, so I never understood GS’s perspective as well.
Delete"I have a hard time trying to come up with a better example of psychic tension"
ReplyDeleteChild in Time. This one does have a monstrous solo and "a shattering, staggering coda", an apocalypstic one. I'm not saying Starless is a copy, far from it. What I am saying is that CiT introduced an entire subgenre.
And I thought it was Bombay Calling.
DeleteSorry for asking this in the comments section of an unrelated album, but do you have any plans to review Nick Cave in the not-so-far future? I would like to know what you think of his post-Abattoir Blues material.
ReplyDeleteKing Crimson rules, by the way.
This whole dull Wilson-Porcupine-Crimson swivel just gets on my ass... Wondering which kind of grandaddy is listening to this boring crap anymore..!?
ReplyDelete