JOY DIVISION: SUBSTANCE (1988; 1978-1980)
1) Warsaw; 2) Leaders Of Men;
3) Digital; 4) Autosuggestion; 5) Transmission;
6) She's Lost Control; 7) Incubation; 8) Dead Souls; 9) Atmosphere; 10) Love Will Tear Us Apart; 11*) No Love Lost; 12*)
Failures; 13*) Glass; 14*) From Safety To Where...?; 15*) Novelty; 16*)
Komakino; 17*) These Days.
General verdict: An obligatory
companion to the LPs — the band's entire lifestory as reflected in (damn good)
music.
Still might be expendable, but Substance is the real deal. Another compilation, this one arrived
at the dawn of the CD age, and its full CD version diligently collected most of
the non-LP A-sides, B-sides, EPs, and shares on collective EPs that the band
released over two years — nothing that was not previously available, but even
in 1988, few people would go around scrounging for old 45's. Not
coincidentally, the same year also saw the release of The Beatles' Past Masters, and it is nice to see Joy
Division having gotten the comprehensive treatment as well so early on.
The tracks are mostly arranged in chronological
order, with the exception that CD-exclusive tracks are tacked on at the end: if
you have a digital copy, I highly recommend moving them to where they actually
belong, so that the main line of Joy Division's evolution becomes fully
transparent. At the very least, it feels a bit odd to have the young, crude,
punkish Ian Curtis bark and sneer his way through ʽNo Love Lostʼ immediately after the so-much-younger-now, refined,
romantic Ian Curtis dark-croons his way through ʽLove Will Tear Us Apartʼ.
Anyone who is only familiar with the band's two
major albums will be pleasantly surprised to learn that in the beginning, Joy
Division were just a punk band — their first EP, An Ideal For Living, recorded in December '77, shows absolutely no
signs of the doom and depression that would permeate their music one year
later. Curtis opens ʽWarsawʼ, the first song on the EP that essentially opened
Joy Division for the world and the world for Joy Division, with a rousing
"3-5-0-1-2-5, GO!", much like Paul McCartney opened up The Beatles
with the "one-two-three-four!" of ʽI Saw Her Standing Thereʼ, and the
first heavy, snappy guitar chords of the song might as well come from The
Adverts or The Damned or any other respectable punk outfit of the era. Ian's
lyrics at this point are angry and frustrated rather than fatalistic, and his
voice bears no resemblance to Jim Morrison whatsoever; and Sumner plays some
of the wildest, choppiest, fastest, sloppiest licks of his career on ʽWarsawʼ
and ʽFailuresʼ.
Is this early music good music? Well, the band
has a good groove going on, and some of Sumner's riffs stick around — but I think
it is safe to say that there is nothing particularly special about this sound,
that Joy Division hadn't really found their own voice by then (they did find
their name, though: I do believe that the Nazi-themed appellation better fits
their early punkish stage, which still had a slightly «offensive» vibe, than
the classic years). The first signs of the «classic» Joy Division arrive with
ʽDigitalʼ and ʽGlassʼ off the Factory
Sample EP — coming exactly one year after, this is where we find Curtis
approbating his new gravelly voice, and the entire band essentially moving from
«punk» to «post-punk», with funkier and more industrialized rhythm section
grooves, more broken-up guitar riffs, and the first faint traces of brutal
fatalism. Even so, their sound here is fairly generic — everybody, from Wire to
Siouxsie & The Banshees, was playing this kind of stuff around 1978.
The first true JD classic here, of course, is
ʽTransmissionʼ. The deep dark bass, the deep dark suicidal voice, the odd
danceability of the song, the excruciating wail of the lead guitar, the
ironically inane "dance, dance, dance, dance to the radio" chorus
that parodies, mocks, and annihilates the very idea of having mindless fun — funny
enough, it does not exactly sound
like anything on Unknown Pleasures,
released a few months before the single, precisely because it seems to,
sarcastically, pander a bit to the dance-crazy crowds, just like a potential
hit single should in 1979. The B-side, ʽNoveltyʼ, with its monumentally
mournful ʽI Want You (She's So Heavy)ʼ vibe in the deceivingly brief intro, is
a better fit for Pleasures, but, as
befits a B-side, seems a bit underworked — no solid hook or memorable guitar
riff.
Two more outtakes from Unknown Pleasures, originally emerging on the collective EP Earcom 2: Contradiction, sound exactly
like any other track on there, but I have mixed feelings about the slowly
plodding six-minute monster ʽAuto-Suggestionʼ — it seems to me like a less
appealing, more meandering relative of ʽI Remember Nothingʼ: the band has not
quite worked out a definite groove here, so it seems more like a Curtis poetry
recital against a lazy background. Essentially, ʽI Remember Nothingʼ does
everything this song tries to do and gets it right, so I can understand why
they preferred to dump this one on an EP that nobody ever bought. I do like the
relative shortness and the quirky, mousey bassline on ʽFrom Safety To
Where...?ʼ.
Skipping a bit ahead, the last period in Joy
Division's history was also oddly split, mood-wise, between LPs and singles. On
one hand, you have Closer, with
pretty much each of the songs on it either a nightmarish vision or a lament for
the end of the world — on the other hand, you have ʽAtmosphereʼ and ʽLove Will
Tear Us Apartʼ, two songs that aren't exactly the epitome of happiness, of
course, but show a tender-sensitive side to Ian that actually proves he is
capable of sending out positive vibes to his imaginary correspondents (well, after
all, so also did Jim Morrison, and Curtis could not allow himself to lag
behind his idol in anything). A possible problem with ʽAtmosphereʼ, the band's
slow, solemn, celestial prayer, is that it clearly displays the limitations of
Ian's voice — he was a technically weak singer, barely capable of holding
prolonged notes, and you have to have the trademark «Keith Richards excuse» (of
the «yes, he is hitting all the wrong notes, but it is SO much his soul that is singing, man!» variety) to
tear up in the proper places, which is a bit hard for me to do.
ʽLove Will Tear Us Apartʼ has no such problem,
although I could personally never place it in my top 10 Joy Division tracks —
the brilliance of the title is not quite enough to remedy the strange
production decision of «losing» Ian's voice somewhere in between the tracks
(although this can be remedied by
listening to the original version from Pennine Studios, which is sometimes
appended as an extra bonus track to Substance),
and the shrill synthesizer lead part is an acquired taste, too. I guess what really rubs me the wrong way about the
song is how it tries to accommodate a happy vibe and a tragic vibe at the same time, and in this particular case,
one somehow outcancels the other for me, leaving me somewhat indifferent to the
singer's plight in the end. Others might find this musical contradiction charmingly
enigmatic, but what can we do here? gut reactions cannot be fooled.
In any case, the song is a legit classic, and
the best way to own it is by owning Substance
as a whole — charting Joy Division's journey from punk to post-punk to
who-needs-punk-when-we're-all-dying-inside, and even with a bit of last minute
romantic spirit on the side. Few have been blessed with such an eventful
journey over the course of a measly two-and-a-half years, and those who have been blessed... well, they're dead,
kind of. Remember this when you're listening: what you're listening to is one
man's speedy journey to the afterlife, etched in tapes and digits for the sakes
of our personal entertainment. If that ain't «substance», I don't know what is.
I always thought "Love Will Tear Us Apart" was intentionally being contradictory. The song's poppy and charming, but those lyrics shit on the vibe. It's tounge in cheek.
ReplyDeleteWill you be reviewing Joy Division's live albums next?
Will you be moving on to New Order after you are done with Joy Division? I think that New Order's situation was comparable to post-Barrett Pink Floyd (the main difference being that NO's transitional phase was much shorter) and that they deserve to be part of the same general narrative with Joy Division.
ReplyDelete