ATHEIST: PIECE OF TIME (1989)
1) Piece Of Time; 2) Unholy
War; 3) Room With A View; 4) On They Slay; 5) Beyond; 6) I Deny; 7) Why
Bother?; 8) Life; 9) No Truth.
«Technical death metal» is a subgenre forever
trapped in its «sub» aspect. What does one really get by combining breakneck
speed / ultraheavy riffage / growling vocals / mock-Satanic lyrics with complex
time signatures / unpredictable song structures / elements of free-form jazz
and atonality? Instead of attracting a joint herd of metalheads and prog nuts,
bridging the gaps between the two, this kind of music is more likely to
alienate both — prog nuts will either be terrified of the death metal clichés
or tend to laugh them off, while metalheads will find it a bit difficult to
move around the mosh pit when that rhythmic pattern is prone to metamorphosing
at unpredictable intervals. (Not that there are any genuine limits to the
power of moshing for the well-seasoned mosher). Which basically explains why
Slayer and Rush are superstars while Atheist, whose idea was to combine the
virtues of both, are not.
But not for lack of trying, of course. On the technical
side, these guys are fairly hard to criticize. Lead vocalist Kelly Shaefer does
not so much «growl» as he «snaps» and «barks», bringing the style a bit closer
to hardcore punk than to regular death metal. Guitar work, shared between Kelly
and Rand Burkey, is up to the highest standards of the genre (not much of a
surprise, though: if you’re into death metal, your technique is either superb
or you’re not into death metal);
bassist Roger Patterson takes his cues from Chris Squire rather than Cliff Burton,
and drummer Steve Flynn is a big lover of polyrhythms, hands and feet flying in
every direction in a state of brotherly democracy for each limb.
In addition, Atheist, as prime representatives
of the intellectual pride of Florida, are not content with the usual formulaic
guts-and-gore lyricism: in interviews, Schaefer remembers the lyrics of early
stuff like ʽLifeʼ (“If chainsaws are your fantasy, I’ll cut your body into
three”) with horrified embarrassment. It’s not as if they are divine masters
of the word — they simply come up with a plain agenda of promoting freedom,
individualism, «brainism», and, of course, atheism that is no better or worse
than anyone else’s, and, again, this brings them closer to the «hardcore»
spirit than the cheese-stained Breath Of The Apocalypse. Of course, in this
setting, the regular bowel-cleansing «wwweeeeaaaaarrrgggh!» that Shaefer lets
out in between all the preaching do come across as somewhat unnecessary. Maybe
they are supposed to represent the protagonist regurgitating all the religious
shit crammed in his bowels by a three-thousand year old tradition.
This is as far as I can go with the appraisal,
though. Problems start at the usual point of entry: when you realize that it is
all but impossible to tell one song from the other. Not even the slow-to-fast
ratio of the tempos is any good indication — Atheist are too smart to let you
catch them like that, and almost every tune includes transitions from slow to
fast and back again, the «fast» usually in the more faithful speed metal
pattern, the «slower» going heavy on the polyrhythms and syncopation and jazzy
jumping (but always with the same metallic guitar tones).
The riffs are way too speedy and too complex
anyway to allow individual notes and chords to trace an emotional pattern; the
vocals create atmosphere, but not hooks; and the finger-flashing metal solos
are the least interesting element of the lot — they sound like any other speed
metal solo ever played. The overall sound is
highly unusual, for sure, but this unusualness comes at the expense of
completely forsaking individuality of the tracks, apart from the fact that one
or two of them open with «moody» little bits of doom-laden electronic effects.
Not that this is so much different for many of the serious jazz albums from
which Shaefer and the boys drew parts of their inspiration — but at least the
best of those albums always knew how to introduce a memorable theme before
veering off into a world of shapeless improvisation. These boys riff and riff
like there was no tomorrow on their anti-religious propaganda pieces, yet they
might just as well have left out the in-between song breaks. One continuous
forty-minute long «progressive death metal symphony» would seem more honest in
this context.
As it is, I can only talk about the overall
sound of this thing: technically mind-blowing, emotionally rousing if you like
to headbang to weird time signatures, and, most importantly, hard to laugh off,
except over those brief intervals where Shaefer is getting electrocuted by his
own vomit all over the microphone. But «hard to laugh off» does not
automatically mean «spiritually overwhelming». On their next album, the band
would move a little further away from the strict regulations of the genre; Piece Of Time is, however, very rigid in
its metal guitar-metal bass-monster drums-growler pipes formula. I give it an «intellectual»
thumbs up
for recognizing the effort to lift the genre into another dimension, but I am
not going to jump for joy just because somebody, somehow, out of nowhere,
invented «metal-fusion» one day — I’d like to see a good reason for that
invention, which Piece Of Time does
not really offer.
This sounds like the ideal band for me. Breackneck speed? Check! (Cry free, Fireball). Ultraheavy riffage? Check! (Call of Ktulhu). Lyrics? Couldn't care less! (Seven stars). Complex time signatures? Check! (Knots). Unpredictable song structures? Check! (Child in Time, November Rain). Elements of free form jazz? OK, a bit harder to digest, though I appreciate Therapy?'s Potato Junkie very much. Atonality? Check! (the entire output of Ustvolskaya). Moreover, I'm neither the typical metalhead nor the typical prog nut.
ReplyDeleteThere is one small but insuperable detail though.
I sincerely despise grunting and growling. For instance I think Opeth a great band as long as that vocalist keeps his mouth shut.