THE ROLLING STONES: THEIR SATANIC MAJESTIES' REQUEST (1967)
1) Sing This All Together; 2) Citadel; 3) In Another Land;
4) 2000 Man; 5) Sing This All Together (See What
Happens); 6) She's A Rainbow; 7) The Lantern; 8) Gomper; 9) 2000
Light Years From Home; 10) On With The Show.
I always feel uncomfortable about joining in
the choir and calling Satanic Majesties'
Request the Stones' «weirdest»
album. This somehow implies that there are certain things we typically expect
of the Stones — and certain things we definitely do not expect of them. But these expectations themselves are due to
nothing else than the Stones eventually setting themselves in a predictable
creative rut with the oncoming of middle age, much like every other artist,
and isn't it a bit ridiculous to judge the Rolling Stones of 1967 by the future
standards of, say, the Rolling Stones of 1976? In a way, it would almost be
weirder if the Rolling Stones did not
go psychedelic in 1967, like almost everybody else did at the time, except for
a few stubbornly obstinate heroes (Somethin'
Else By The Kinks — now there's a
truly weird album by that year's standards!). And seeing Mick Jagger and Keith
Richards in kaftans was, after all, no more weird than seeing Eric Clapton with
frizzed hair, or The Hollies wielding sitars and playing with tape effects.
There are two reasons why, when discussing the
Golden Age of the Stones (1966-72, and not one year less), one should never
make an embarrassing exception for their psychedelic suite. One: even despite
all the personal troubles that they had in 1967, Jagger and Richards had only
recently reached top songwriting form, and top songwriting form does not go
away that easily once it has been reached — even if one finds plenty of things
to complain about in the arrangement and production departments, it is hard to
deny the sheer quantity of compositional ideas contained in these songs. Two:
claims that the Stones were «aping the Beatles» with their psychedelic creativity
are ridiculously simplistic. The Stones did embrace psychedelia, but they put
their own and nobody else's stamp on it. As I quickly run the usual gamut of
psychedelic classics of the era in my mind (Sgt. Pepper, Are You Experienced,
Psychedelic Sounds Of The 13th Floor
Elevators, Piper At The Gates Of
Dawn, Days Of Future Passed,
etc.), there is not a single one of these that could be selected as a
«blueprint» for Satanic Majesties.
Because this was not a simple case of «hey, let's just drop everything we did
before and go play some sitars!» This is a case of taking everything they had
learned in the previous three years — the darkness, the nastiness, the art of
the guitar riff, the unpredictable experimental instrumentation — and applying
it to the emerging new musical idiom: a synthesis like no other.
Contrary to a widespread opinion that Satanic Majesties was largely the
brainchild of Brian Jones (because who else could push the Stones to far-out
psychedelia but the guy who originally brought sitars, marimbas, and dulcimers
to the table?), Mick and Keith were just as responsible for the shift as Brian
— Keith would later regret this explicitly, but Mick, always on the lookout for
all sorts of shifts in musical fashions, seems to have retained more love in
his heart for this album than he has for Between
The Buttons. In any case, all the songwriting credits still go to Mick and
Keith, with the notable addition of Bill Wyman as the sole author responsible
for ʽIn Another Landʼ (now there's an
actual bit of first-rate weirdness — Bill's only songwriting credit on a proper
Stones album!), and there is not a single shred of evidence to suggest that
either of the two did not have great fun recording it — with all due
reservations, of course, considering that 1967 in general was hardly a lot of
«fun» for the Stones with all their drug trials and impending jail terms
hanging over them, Damocles-style, for a large part of the year.
That nervous tension and (not unjustified) aura
of paranoia are often quoted as the spirit that pervades Satanic Majesties, and, indeed, it makes sense to wonder if the
album would have been less tense and dark without the drug busts — then again,
history knows no ifs: first, in 1967, the Stones were quite predictably
selected as the scapegoats, what with their «dangerous» public image and
general notoriety, and second, who could genuinely expect the Rolling Stones to
sit there with happy, careless, cozily-stoned smiles on their faces and sing
about the gorgeous bliss of Flower Power? Who could even begin to imagine an
idealistic Mick Jagger joining in the exuberant camaraderie and clapping and
singing along to hippie bullshit like "all you need is love, love is all
you need" like there was no tomorrow?..
Oops, never mind. Anyway, speculations and
alternate scenarios aside, the fact remains: Their Satanic Majesties' Request gives us a darker, more
uncomfortable, more psychologically disturbing brand of psychedelia than most
other brands at the time. It does share a certain conceptuality with Sgt. Pepper — in terms of having an
encircling framework: I like to think of it as a «dream journey», where things
begin in real life (ʽSing This All Togetherʼ as a party anthem or a
mock-shamanistic merry-go-round-the-bonfire ritual), lead the protagonist into
a nightmarish trance, when, like an adult version of Alice in Wonderland, he
passes through alternating surrealist visions of mystery, beauty, and danger
(not necessarily in that order), and then finally awaken him to the crude,
happy-sad reality of life's hustle and bustle (ʽOn With The Showʼ). But the
fantasy world of the Rolling Stones is much less pleasant than that of the
Beatles — instead of traveling circuses and Lucys with diamonds and lovely
Ritas, your companions will be odd types like 2000 Man and Gomper, cloaked in
incomprehensibility and menace — and much of the time, you won't even have any
companionship at all, being two thousand light years away from home and all
that. It's so very lonely, you know.
Actually, the «no fun» thing begins at the very
beginning. A title like ʽSing This All Togetherʼ would normally imply an
atmosphere of collective merriment — but there is nothing like that here.
Instead, the song agrees very well with lyrics like "Pictures of us
beating on our drum / Never stopping till the rain has come" — it does sound like a slightly disorganized
collective prayer for rain (or, perhaps, something a little stronger), a seance
where nobody can be truly sure of the possible outcome. The odd, «bubbly» sound
of the melody, emphasizing the tribalistic rhythm over harmony with every one
of the instruments involved, is further enhanced in the instrumental break,
which gives the impression that we are now being temporarily dragged under the
water — or, at least, through some purple haze — an experience that could
either lead to enlightenment or turn
out to be lethal. As we emerge from the haze into a reprise of the chorus, it's
like gasping for air — see, that spice trance wasn't so bad after all — but it
does not take long before real life, with one last whiff of the horn section,
once again transitions into the nightmare part, and this time, it sort of stays
there almost until the end.
What happens next is a sequence of events and
impressions so strange, so scattered, and yet so meaningful that it is not even
clear to me where to start. So why don't I start with a personal favorite of
mine, a song that is rarely listed as a particular highlight, but one that has
always looked to me like it contained the key to the entire album — and maybe
even to a large part of the Stones' entire career? ʽThe Lanternʼ is one of
those «shine-a-light-in-the-dark» tunes to which I have often recurred at
various bad moments in life, and whose compositional brilliance I cannot cease
to admire. Distant tolling of the bells, suggesting something mournful — then
several bars of a minor-key funereal melody, searching for a resolution — then
a strange, stuttering melody, comprised of an insecure acoustic guitar part,
searching for the right groove, and an odd broken sound that I have never been
able to decipher. Guitar? Organ? Mellotron? Whatever it is, in just a few bars
they have effectively created the atmosphere of a lost, terrified soul making
its lost, terrified way through some pitch-black cavern... and then, out of the
distance, with a soft, but stern crack of the drums, in fade those hope-giving
vocals: "Weeeeeee.... in our present life...". That thing alone would
be pretty awesome, but the climactic part is the mid-verse, with Mick
forcefully counting the beats on "...that IF you are the FIRST to go,
you'll LEAVE a sign to LET me know", each of the heavily accentuated
syllables raising the tension. As far as I'm concerned, this is the first — and
far from the last — of his genuinely «spirited» vocal performances, those that
would probably hit the ceiling on ʽMoonlight Mileʼ, ʽShine A Lightʼ, and
ʽWinterʼ, the ones that somehow tie together Earth and Heaven by combining
sarcasm, decadence and naughtiness, on one hand, with a call for hope,
optimism, and salvation, on the other. You can give the song a literal
interpretation — a departed spirit comes back to her lover at night, preparing
him for the road to take — but I prefer a more general and abstract one: a song
about a beacon of hope in pitch-black darkness, and goddammit if I know of a
more beautiful musical metaphor (at least, in the realm of pop music) than this
one, opening a still underrated — in my mind — tradition of Heartbreaking
Humanism in the Stones' career.
There are other occasional chunks of Light and
Beauty on the album, of course, the most obvious of which is ʽShe's A Rainbowʼ
— a song that largely belongs to Nicky Hopkins and his Mozartian piano, not to
mention an exquisite baroque string arrangement from the
soon-to-be-famous-for-other-endeavors John Paul Jones, and is usually lauded
even by the album's detractors as one of the Stones' most resplendent ballads
ever. Indeed, on this one it is practically impossible to find any subtle hints
at a darker side — other than, perhaps, the odd «alarm-like» distorted guitar
chords that generate an unpredictably eerie coda to the song (but also
alleviate its transition into the darkness of ʽThe Lanternʼ) — but then again,
even the bleakest of interminable nightmares may be allowed to have its moments
of respite, and being so hemmed on all sides by eeriness only helps further
accentuate the baroque elegance of the song. This is the only time in the
band's career that they wrote a paean to Abstract Beauty — good luck trying to
find a real-life addressee of the song — and, lo and behold, it is as gorgeous
as any of the masterpieces of the baroque-pop era, with a piano / strings /
brass mix that even a Brian Wilson could have envied, though this lively and
somewhat pompous approach is rather distant from his usual pensive style.
But other than that, what we have here is one
unsettling experience after another. There's the sci-fi, proto-Hawkwind hustle
and bustle of a complex and dangerous-looking futuristic "concrete
hills" city in ʽThe Citadelʼ, a song that by-the-book Stones fans respect
a little more than the others because it is the only one to feature a monstrous
hard-rock riff from Keith but which is actually so much more than just one riff
— the harpsichords, the Mellotrons, the hell-raising drums, the merciless
vocals, and, above all, that odd ringing sound, the one that gives the impression
of droplets of liquid gold repetitively dripping from a huge faucet in the
sky... again, what the hell is it, and why is it there? Still a mystery to me.
There's Wyman's ʽIn Another Landʼ, which is very much like a
dream-within-a-dream sequence — that harpsichord never sounded quite that cold
without the winter winds howling around it, and we never even get to understand
what's better: getting caught up in a dream like that or waking up to find out
that it was all "some kind of joke" (I assume that the former is
still preferable, given how the song ends with some authentic, and fairly
impressive, snoring that the band allegedly diligently captured on tape from
Bill himself one day in September). There's ʽ2000 Manʼ, an almost «progressive»
mini-suite that not only contains three equally catchy, but totally distinct,
melodic parts, but also functions as a smart foresight into the technological
future — "Oh daddy, your brain's still flashing / Like it did when you
were young / Or did you come down crashin' / Seein' all the things you've done
/ Oh, it's a big put on" seems to resonate quite painfully these days, for
a number of reasons.
And then, «the darkest hour is right before
dawn» — ʽ2000 Light Years From Homeʼ is an absolute gem of the sci-fi
subgenre. Pink Floyd had already told us that "stars can frighten" a
short while ago, but if I had to make a choice between the compositional and
sonic weirdness that is ʽAstronomy Domineʼ and the somewhat more conventional
sound of ʽ2000 Light Yearsʼ, I'd still go for the latter. ʽAstronomy Domineʼ
was an ambitious sonic painting — an approximate musical representation of
the grandness, complexity, and randomness of the Universe — but largely a
depersonalized one, with the artist as an uninvolved spectator, maybe glued to
a telescope or something. ʽ2000 Light Yearsʼ is not about the wonders of the
Cosmos — it is a deeply personal impression of how terrifying it feels to be
alone in a galaxy far far away, and by «galaxy» one might just as well mean
«bad acid trip» or «solitary cell in a London prison». Everything about the
song is dark, cold, repellent, destined to spook or frighten (including the
first forty seconds of atonal piano clanging, which is arguably as close as the
Stones ever got to true avantgarde; or the amazing guitar solo, all of it
played in the lowest range of the instrument and sounding like the digestion
process of some giant ugly space slug) — the bassline is building up suspense,
the Mellotrons are pumping up mystery, and Mick makes his best effort to sound out
of a cryogenic chamber. In certain contexts, ʽ2000 Light Years From Homeʼ might
sound absolutely terrifying (this is definitely not a song I'd recommend for astronauts to take with them on their
missions for entertainment) — and while fairly soon we would be getting plenty
of psychological singer-songwriter stuff on the issue of cosmic loneliness and
isolation, from ʽSpace Oddityʼ to ʽRocket Manʼ and beyond, none of these songs
would be bent on inducing sheer psychic terror through purely musical means. I
guess we do have something to thank that judge for, after all — allegedly, Mick
came up with the basic concept and lyrics of the song during his 24 hours in
Brixton Prison.
With all these great performances in sight, I
no longer seriously bother about the «excesses» of the record — such as the
interminable psycho-jamming of ʽSing This All Together (See What Happens)ʼ and
the Eastern-influenced droning on ʽGomperʼ. In fact, I definitely seem to understand
and even enjoy them much better than, say, the average improvisation by the
Grateful Dead; and I certainly do not understand how it is possible to condemn
them while at the same time singing hipster praise for something like the
Velvet Underground's ʽEuropean Sonʼ or ʽSister Rayʼ from that same year. Of
course, the Stones were not well-versed in contemporary avantgarde or modern
classical, but then again, everything was instinct rather than science back
then, and I'd say that in both of these cases their instincts worked all right
— ʽSee What Happensʼ, introduced with an innocuous, but insightful question of
"where's that joint?", is like the soundtrack to a guided (or
mis-guided) trip through some surrealist freak show (all it lacks is a Salvador
Dali gallery for visual accompaniment), and ʽGomperʼ is like... well, like a
typically Stones-like interpretation of an Indian raga. Imagine Ravi Shankar
and friends suddenly having a freaked-out panic attack in the middle of a concert,
and that's ʽGomperʼ for you. It's fun! And even if it isn't, you still have to
admit that they have a pretty freaky combination of instruments out there.
By the time we emerge — almost literally emerge — into the grounded,
down-to-earth conclusion of ʽOn With The Showʼ, you might feel relieved,
really shaken awake from a nasty, but unforgettable dream that just showed you
the flipside of ʽLucy In The Sky With Diamondsʼ. Do not let yourself be fooled
by the preconception that, since this is the Stones' psychedelic album, Their Satanic Majesties' Request is
about glorifying psychedelia and propagating
the pleasures of that whole mind-opening business: there is nothing of the kind
there, and there is not a single song on the album of which anybody should feel
«ashamed» after all these years. This is an astute, intelligently designed and
completely self-sufficient piece of musical art — featuring some of the band's
most interesting lyrical, melodic, and textural ideas of all time, and having
certain analytical qualities of its own; in fact, I'd go as far as to say that
it has a much more intellectual
nature to it than Sgt. Pepper, and
that its release, at the tail end of the magic year 1967, makes it a perfect
wrap-up offering for the psychedelic excesses of that year, sending up some of
these excesses and already containing certain antidotes for others. Even the
album sleeve, when seen from that perspective, would look like a
tongue-in-cheek reaction to Sgt. Pepper
and the like (though it probably wasn't, and, in fact, the album sleeve is
probably the corniest element of all here — I still love its furious colors,
though).
In recent years (decades?), Satanic Majesties, after having for a
very long time been regarded as the band's biggest blunder in their peak years,
started gaining a rather large cult following — particularly among those
hipsters who like to declare themselves professionally bored with the «typical»
blues-rock of pre-1966 / post-1967 Rolling Stones and are only interested in
stuff that would allow the band to be, at least temporarily, aligned with either
the Kinks or Syd Barrett's Floyd or the Zombies or whatnot. This is, I believe,
a different kind of extreme, and I have no desire whatsoever to sing this
praise of Satanic Majesties at the
expense of Beggars Banquet — or vice
versa. The thing is, the sheer greatness of the Stones, and their ability to
hold their own beside the Beatles, lies precisely in their ability (at one
time) to put out a record like Satanic
Majesties, and then to follow it
up with a record like Beggars Banquet.
Only a rough-hewn, harsh, blues-rock-raised rock'n'roll band could have made a dark
psychedelic album like Satanic Majesties
— and only a band that had just made a dark psychedelic album like Satanic Majesties could go on and inject
some of that darkness and artistic pretense into their subsequent blues-rock
records like Beggars Banquet. One
simply does not exist without the other, and in order to truly «get» the
Stones, the blues-rocker in you has to be complemented by the art-rocker, and
vice versa — this, in my opinion, is the primary reason why this band gets so criminally
underrated today by so many fans on both sides (whereas in their actual prime,
when target groups for different musical styles were not so harshly
delineated, their popular reputation was unassailable). In short, as the Stones
say themselves — "open your heads, let the pictures come". And here
comes a thumbs
up for a creative masterpiece that I think I love even more these
days than when I first got my mind blown by it some thirty years ago.