Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Joy Division. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joy Division. Show all posts

Friday, February 16, 2018

Joy Division: Les Bains Douches 18 December 1979

JOY DIVISION: LES BAINS DOUCHES 18 DECEMBER 1979 (2001)

1) Disorder; 2) Love Will Tear Us Apart; 3) Insight; 4) Shadowplay; 5) Transmission; 6) Day Of The Lords; 7) 24 Hours; 8) These Days; 9) A Means To An End; 10) Passover; 11) New Dawn Fades; 12) Atrocity Exhibition; 13) Digital; 14) Dead Souls; 15) Auto­suggestion; 16) Atmosphere.

General verdict: A kick-ass slab of prime Joy Division live power — just a little too short for perfection.

So much of the officially and semi-officially released Joy Division archival material is prime sonic crap that Les Bains Douches squarely falls in the «where have you been all my life» cate­gory. After all the audience-recording quality stuff that was made available on Heart And Soul or as bonus packages for other albums, all of a sudden, in 2001 we get nine tracks and thirty-six minutes of live Joy Division in their prime — in fabulous sound quality, at least when compared to everything else. The mix is a bit rough, the balance between the band and the audience is not perfect, but for the first time ever (discounting some of the radio sessions that were recorded in studio environments), you actually get to hear the guitar, the bass, the drums, and the vocals as connected, but separate entities, loud and clear. Why, of all places, this had to be a small dance club in the heart of Paris, converted from an older public bath facility (hence the name), remains a bit of a mystery — but at least it had some great acoustics to it.

Even better, the band was hot on that particular night, playing well-tested material from Un­known Pleasures along with a few newer tracks from the upcoming Closer with such verve that the show occasionally seems almost oriented at traditional «classic rock fans» than modernist New Wavers. It does not take more than the first track to understand the difference — ʽDisorderʼ, opening both Pleasures and this concert, sounds like two completely dissimilar entities. Morris and Hook, in particular, are energetic beasts in this setting, rather than a couple of Kraftwerkian robots under Hannett's titular supervision; and Sumner's guitar tone can't help but be thicker and gruffer in order to hold its own against the power punch of the rhythm section. Does this make the live versions better? No — it simply makes Joy Division qualify for that small category of rock bands whose «live face» and «studio face» emphasize different strengths and aspects of their songs; and if we have their producer to thank for it, well, this is who we are going to thank.

Among the various highlights here is ʽShadowplayʼ (simply because it is probably my favorite JD song, and it makes me happy every time they do it justice); a noisy, over-the-top, and fairly rare performance of ʽDay Of The Lordsʼ, not as Sabbath-esque as in the studio version, but drowning the audience in non-stop barrages of power chords; and a «tempest take» on ʽA Means To An Endʼ, where even Curtis is infected by the vicious and violent playing style to the point of showing a few teeth — his "I put my trust in you!" here is the implicit equivalent of "I put my trust in you, BITCH!!", and he even pulls that off convincingly. A relative lowlight is ʽLove Will Tear Us Apartʼ, but only because Sumner's synth is horrendously out of tune — and so loud and whiny that it brings an unnecessarily amateurish flavor to the concert. But it is possible to learn to live with that once the original shock has passed.

Sadly, the entire show, or the entire salvageable part of the show, was so short that the album had to be beefed up by tracks from two other performances (in Amsterdam and Eindhoven) — quite comparable in the level of energy and dedication, but not in terms of sound quality: these last seven tracks are murkier, dirtier, and more reminiscent of what we already knew. Their inclusion does make the whole experience more comprehensive, throwing in Closer-era material like ʽAtrocity Exhibitionʼ and soulful favorites like ʽAtmosphereʼ; but only the tracks from the real Bains Douches, I am afraid, will warant repeated listens. Still, even a half-hour show in profes­sional sound quality from these guys is a blessing — and considering how few classic live albums there are in general from the «Silver Age of Rock Music», Les Bains Douches, despite coming twenty years late to the party, might make a strong contender for the top five.

Friday, February 9, 2018

Joy Division: Heart And Soul

JOY DIVISION: HEART AND SOUL (1977-1980; 1997)

CD I: Unknown Pleasures + bonus tracks; CD II: Closer + bonus tracks; CD III: Studio rarities; CD IV: Live rarities.

General verdict: Hardly worth it for the rarities, definitely worth it for the comprehensive feels.

Although I do not usually make separate sections for boxsets, Heart And Soul merits an exception, since it contains almost two discs' worth of previously unreleased, or at least long-out-of-print, goodies. Before the special expanded releases of Unknown Pleasures and Closer, it may have been the ultimate package for the fan — just about everything the band ever released in its lifetime and beyond that, wrapped together in a single artsy package, with tons of photos, liner notes, lyrics, you name it. Today, in the age of digital downloads, its importance has certainly dimmed down, and as of 2017, the box is out of print, but I'm pretty sure that it, or its equivalent, will return again sooner or later, because, after all, what is a cult band without a cult coffeetable boxset?

That said, in terms of getting us any new material it is a relative disappointment. The first two CDs offer you the two classic albums plus a selection of single and EP tracks, most of which had already been available on Still and Substance. The main hopes lie with the third disc, a chrono­logical assemblage of previously released and unreleased rarities, starting with the An Ideal For Living EP (ʽWarsawʼ and other tracks from the punk era), which we already saw on Substance; continuing with three tracks from the abandoned Warsaw album, discussed in the previous review; and probably culminating with a set of live-in-the-studio tracks from The Peel Sessions — truly the high point, since these performances only saw very limited release in EP and CD form in the late Eighties and early Nineties. For the record, these versions of ʽLove Will Tear Us Apartʼ and ʽColonyʼ sound just about perfect, sharper and with more energy than in their usual form, perhaps. However, collectors will probably experience the greatest delight at the early 1980 demo of ʽCeremonyʼ — presented here in rather low fidelity, but still far clearer in terms of guitar sound than on any live recording (except for the vocals, alas, which are barely audible).

The real disappointment is the fourth disc. Apparently, compilers of the boxset wanted to make fans really happy by scooping up as much previously unreleased material as they could find; un­fortunately, it seems like none of the tracks are soundboard recordings — everything is strictly bootleg quality, particularly the first ten tracks, taken from a Manchester show in July 1979, when the band was arguably at its energetic peak: the version of ʽInterzoneʼ captured here shows them ready to bring down the house, but, unfortunately, even with the lowest audiophile require­ments (like mine) it is fairly hard to enjoy the muck with half of the frequencies eaten up. On the other end of the spectrum, the February 29, 1980 show at the Lyceum in London was hardly one of their best gigs — you do get to witness a rare live version of ʽThe Eternalʼ, but Curtis is so awfully out of tune on it that it just keeps reminding me of how technically weak as a singer he had always been, and that is not something I need to be reminded of while following the slow funeral procession of the song.

Consequently, the optimistic perspective on the boxset is that it presents you with everything you ever wanted to know about Joy Division and more. The pessimistic perspective, on the other hand, is that it is highly questionable whether you actually want to know more. For all the bootleggish nature of Warsaw, that album, when heard in complete form, did really add an entire new chapter to the Joy Division history — Heart And Soul only borrows a few pages out of that chapter, and clearly shows you that this is it, folks: after all, Joy Division were not The Fall or Guided By Voices — they reached higher peaks, perhaps, but at the expense of skipping those smooth, endless kilometers of lower valleys. Still, great bands deserve optimistic perspectives that trump pessimistic ones, don't they?

Friday, February 2, 2018

Joy Division: Warsaw

JOY DIVISION: WARSAW (1977-1978; 1994)

1) The Drawback; 2) Leaders Of Men; 3) They Walked In Line; 4) Failures; 5) Novelty; 6) No Love Lost; 7) Transmission; 8) Living In The Ice Age; 9) Interzone; 10) Warsaw; 11) Shadowplay; 12) As You Said; 13*) Inside The Line; 14*) Gutz; 15*) At A Later Date; 16*) The Kill; 17*) You're No Good For Me.

General verdict: Well, why not go back in time for a change and see Joy Division as punks rather than post-punks?

Most of the songs on this album were well known to audiences in 1994 — some from Unknown Pleasures, some from singles and EPs gathered on Substance, some from outtakes captured on Still — but all of these versions actually go back to the infamous «RCA Sessions», held by the band in May 1978. The twelve tracks in question were supposed to be their first LP, still provi­sionally titled Warsaw, despite the band already having changed its name to Joy Division. How­ever, things fell through, allegedly due to the band being disappointed with the label's post-production, and although the tracks had been in active bootleg circulation for decades, it was not until 1994 that the record was legally licensed and released by MPG Records.

Naturally, the release itself was a cash-in, considering the unending demand for new Joy Division product, somewhat offset by severed lines of communication between Earth and Ian Curtis. But! In retrospect, this is a brilliant cash-in, and it is awfully sad, really, that this album will always count as an archival document and not as a legit Joy Division product — because not only is it pretty damn good, it also completes the picture in such an effective way as could never be provided by a Still-level or even Substance-level compilation.

Simply put, this is a coherent, comprehensive, and detailed portrait of Joy Division in their infancy — a sort of Please Please Me that only hints at the greatness to come, but this bare hint has a fresh, raw, innocent charm of its own. This is the stage when Joy Division were still a gritty punk band, a stage when Hook, Sumner, and Morris played brutally and aggressively, a stage when Curtis was yet far away from developing his deep Morrison-style voice, preferring to growl and bark in a much higher, much more punkish pitch. True enough, at this stage they had not yet found their unique voice — but hey, they could rock, and the tight, tense, no-nonsense grooves that dominate the album are nothing to sneer at.

I shall not give detailed comments on the individual songs, considering that most of them had been previously discussed one way or another (or not discussed if I did not think they merited special discussion). I will just say that, although the production values throughout are fairly rough, the sound will very much satisfy all those who find problems with Hannett's production and like to hear their Joy Division crisp and powerful, rather than drenched in echo, reverb, and other New Wavish technological effects. I myself reserve judgement, but damn if it isn't at least interesting to hear ʽShadowplayʼ and ʽInterzoneʼ as thick, crunchy rockers with Stooges-like guitar tones (in fact, I have only just realized that ʽInterzoneʼ is a straight-ahead tribute to Fun House, and could fit on that album like a glove). And no electronic gloss on the drums! and not in a piss-poorly recorded live setting! No, this record definitely has some nifty reasons to exist.

In addition to the RCA Sessions, the album goes even deeper in time and throws on five demo tracks from 1977 (back when the band was still named Warsaw) — the first known examples of studio recordings made by the team, with predictably shitty quality but even more reminiscent of the Sex Pistols and other punk pioneers. Actually, ʽGutzʼ, with its insane tempo and undeciphe­rable screaming, might be as close to hardcore as Joy Division ever got — two minutes of all-out blasting stupidity, but loaded with charming determination. Truthfully, most of this stuff is rudi­mentary and derivative shite, but even The Beatles used to be The Quarrymen, and the greater you get, the more fascinating is your backstory.

Cutting a long story short, Warsaw is an absolute must-own for any Joy Division fan, and will be particularly pleasing to those who share the band's own opinion — that Hannett's production sold short their rock-the-house-down abilities. Of course, back at the time this only reflected the narrowness of the band's vision, what with Hannett pushing them into the next decade and the next dimension of musical sound; but now that the age of technological innovation (or, at least, specifically New Wave-related technological innovation) is long past, we have a right to look at these songs from another angle — and somehow, it is nice to know that there was a time when they were brimming with the energy of raw anger and frustration, rather than imploding from within with the internalized energy of doom and depression.

Friday, January 26, 2018

Joy Division: Substance

JOY DIVISION: SUBSTANCE (1988; 1978-1980)

1) Warsaw; 2) Leaders Of Men; 3) Digital; 4) Autosuggestion; 5) Transmission; 6) She's Lost Control; 7) Incubation; 8) Dead Souls; 9) Atmosphere; 10) Love Will Tear Us Apart; 11*) No Love Lost; 12*) Failures; 13*) Glass; 14*) From Safety To Where...?; 15*) Novelty; 16*) Komakino; 17*) These Days.

General verdict: An obligatory companion to the LPs — the band's entire lifestory as reflected in (damn good) music.

Still might be expendable, but Substance is the real deal. Another compilation, this one arrived at the dawn of the CD age, and its full CD version diligently collected most of the non-LP A-sides, B-sides, EPs, and shares on collective EPs that the band released over two years — nothing that was not previously available, but even in 1988, few people would go around scrounging for old 45's. Not coincidentally, the same year also saw the release of The Beatles' Past Masters, and it is nice to see Joy Division having gotten the comprehensive treatment as well so early on.

The tracks are mostly arranged in chronological order, with the exception that CD-exclusive tracks are tacked on at the end: if you have a digital copy, I highly recommend moving them to where they actually belong, so that the main line of Joy Division's evolution becomes fully transparent. At the very least, it feels a bit odd to have the young, crude, punkish Ian Curtis bark and sneer his way through ʽNo Love Lostʼ immediately after the so-much-younger-now, refined, romantic Ian Curtis dark-croons his way through ʽLove Will Tear Us Apartʼ.

Anyone who is only familiar with the band's two major albums will be pleasantly surprised to learn that in the beginning, Joy Division were just a punk band — their first EP, An Ideal For Living, recorded in December '77, shows absolutely no signs of the doom and depression that would permeate their music one year later. Curtis opens ʽWarsawʼ, the first song on the EP that essentially opened Joy Division for the world and the world for Joy Division, with a rousing "3-5-0-1-2-5, GO!", much like Paul McCartney opened up The Beatles with the "one-two-three-four!" of ʽI Saw Her Standing Thereʼ, and the first heavy, snappy guitar chords of the song might as well come from The Adverts or The Damned or any other respectable punk outfit of the era. Ian's lyrics at this point are angry and frustrated rather than fatalistic, and his voice bears no resem­blance to Jim Morrison whatsoever; and Sumner plays some of the wildest, choppiest, fastest, sloppiest licks of his career on ʽWarsawʼ and ʽFailuresʼ.

Is this early music good music? Well, the band has a good groove going on, and some of Sum­ner's riffs stick around — but I think it is safe to say that there is nothing particularly special about this sound, that Joy Division hadn't really found their own voice by then (they did find their name, though: I do believe that the Nazi-themed appellation better fits their early punkish stage, which still had a slightly «offensive» vibe, than the classic years). The first signs of the «classic» Joy Division arrive with ʽDigitalʼ and ʽGlassʼ off the Factory Sample EP — coming exactly one year after, this is where we find Curtis approbating his new gravelly voice, and the entire band essentially moving from «punk» to «post-punk», with funkier and more industrialized rhythm section grooves, more broken-up guitar riffs, and the first faint traces of brutal fatalism. Even so, their sound here is fairly generic — everybody, from Wire to Siouxsie & The Banshees, was playing this kind of stuff around 1978.

The first true JD classic here, of course, is ʽTransmissionʼ. The deep dark bass, the deep dark suicidal voice, the odd danceability of the song, the excruciating wail of the lead guitar, the ironically inane "dance, dance, dance, dance to the radio" chorus that parodies, mocks, and annihilates the very idea of having mindless fun — funny enough, it does not exactly sound like anything on Unknown Pleasures, released a few months before the single, precisely because it seems to, sarcastically, pander a bit to the dance-crazy crowds, just like a potential hit single should in 1979. The B-side, ʽNoveltyʼ, with its monumentally mournful ʽI Want You (She's So Heavy)ʼ vibe in the deceivingly brief intro, is a better fit for Pleasures, but, as befits a B-side, seems a bit underworked — no solid hook or memorable guitar riff.

Two more outtakes from Unknown Pleasures, originally emerging on the collective EP Earcom 2: Contradiction, sound exactly like any other track on there, but I have mixed feelings about the slowly plodding six-minute monster ʽAuto-Suggestionʼ — it seems to me like a less appealing, more meandering relative of ʽI Remember Nothingʼ: the band has not quite worked out a definite groove here, so it seems more like a Curtis poetry recital against a lazy background. Essentially, ʽI Remember Nothingʼ does everything this song tries to do and gets it right, so I can understand why they preferred to dump this one on an EP that nobody ever bought. I do like the relative shortness and the quirky, mousey bassline on ʽFrom Safety To Where...?ʼ.

Skipping a bit ahead, the last period in Joy Division's history was also oddly split, mood-wise, between LPs and singles. On one hand, you have Closer, with pretty much each of the songs on it either a nightmarish vision or a lament for the end of the world — on the other hand, you have ʽAtmosphereʼ and ʽLove Will Tear Us Apartʼ, two songs that aren't exactly the epitome of happi­ness, of course, but show a tender-sensitive side to Ian that actually proves he is capable of sending out positive vibes to his imaginary correspondents (well, after all, so also did Jim Morri­son, and Curtis could not allow himself to lag behind his idol in anything). A possible problem with ʽAtmosphereʼ, the band's slow, solemn, celestial prayer, is that it clearly displays the limita­tions of Ian's voice — he was a technically weak singer, barely capable of holding prolonged notes, and you have to have the trademark «Keith Richards excuse» (of the «yes, he is hitting all the wrong notes, but it is SO much his soul that is singing, man!» variety) to tear up in the proper places, which is a bit hard for me to do.

ʽLove Will Tear Us Apartʼ has no such problem, although I could personally never place it in my top 10 Joy Division tracks — the brilliance of the title is not quite enough to remedy the strange production decision of «losing» Ian's voice somewhere in between the tracks (although this can be remedied by listening to the original version from Pennine Studios, which is sometimes appended as an extra bonus track to Substance), and the shrill synthesizer lead part is an acquired taste, too. I guess what really rubs me the wrong way about the song is how it tries to accom­modate a happy vibe and a tragic vibe at the same time, and in this particular case, one somehow outcancels the other for me, leaving me somewhat indifferent to the singer's plight in the end. Others might find this musical contradiction charmingly enigmatic, but what can we do here? gut reactions cannot be fooled.

In any case, the song is a legit classic, and the best way to own it is by owning Substance as a whole — charting Joy Division's journey from punk to post-punk to who-needs-punk-when-we're-all-dying-inside, and even with a bit of last minute romantic spirit on the side. Few have been blessed with such an eventful journey over the course of a measly two-and-a-half years, and those who have been blessed... well, they're dead, kind of. Remember this when you're listening: what you're listening to is one man's speedy journey to the afterlife, etched in tapes and digits for the sakes of our personal entertainment. If that ain't «substance», I don't know what is.

Friday, January 19, 2018

Joy Division: Still

JOY DIVISION: STILL (1981)

1) Exercise One; 2) Ice Age; 3) The Sound Of Music; 4) Glass; 5) The Only Mistake; 6) Walked In Line; 7) The Kill; 8) Something Must Break; 9) Dead Souls; 10) Sister Ray; 11) Ceremony; 12) Shadow Play; 13) Means To An End; 14) Passover; 15) New Dawn Fades; 16) Transmission; 17) Disorder; 18) Isolation; 19) Decades; 20) Digital.

General verdict: Somewhat mediocre outtakes, but hey, it's Joy Division! It's treasurable by default!

This somewhat sprawling coda to Joy Division's short career may be called the last «proper» JD album, largely because all of its first disc consists of previously unreleased outtakes, but it is also the first in a lengthy series of posthumous releases that, frankly, do a better job of confirming the enormity of the legend than of enriching the legend with truly valuable content. Joy Division were not a collective Bob Dylan, their productivity even in peak years was rather modest, and when they left something behind, there was usually a good reason for this.

The nine original songs on the first disc (the tenth is a live cover of The Velvet Underground's ʽSister Rayʼ) date from October '78 to January '80, but the majority of them date from the Unknown Pleasures period, so what you would expect to find is a bunch of mid- to fast-tempo rockers, not very heavy on atmospheric subtleties and, since they are outtakes, not too polished production-wise. The briefest assessment of them all that can be made is: they add nothing to what we already know, think, or feel about Joy Division. And why should they? They represent shelved, abandoned, or temporarily frozen ideas that would later be reworked and perfected into the shape of those Joy Division songs that we already know and love. But if you state it clearly and openly that you are here for subtle nuances — that you simply cherish that sound and that mood too much to deny yourself the pleasure of reliving the same dream on a new pillowsheet — then welcome to the club.

Proceeding in chronological order, the earliest inclusion is ʽGlassʼ, the only track here that had been previously released — on an early Factory Records sampler EP, originally released in late 1978 and featuring tracks from Joy Division, Cabaret Voltaire, and some minor acts. It still has very little of classic JD gloom and plays more like a regular post-punk rocker, all choppy chords and pulsating energy and an industrial-sounding distorted bassline that commands most of the attention. Ian sounds angry and pissed, with a bark in his voice that would rarely be heard again, but the song does not work well as a whole, because it is not dark enough to be spooky and not angry enough to make your blood boil.

The four April '79 outtakes from the Unknown Pleasures sessions are interesting, but I can feel pity only for ʽExercise Oneʼ — its sonic structure, with siren-like and tornado-like guitars swirling around a monotonous bassline, rather reminds me of Closer, and with better production the song might have occupied a respectable position on that album, bypassing the still-too-pop values of Unknown Pleasures. ʽWalked In Lineʼ and ʽThe Killʼ are frantic rockers, and both seem inspired by the likes of Brian Eno's ʽThird Uncleʼ — but, once again, lacking the depth and occasional scariness of the fast-paced material that did make it onto the album. And ʽThe Only Mistakeʼ is curious because of its waltzing tempo, but the song's chorus ("strain, take the strain, these days we love") sounds a bit silly, and whatever they wanted to say with the song, it does not look like they managed to say it distinctly.

As time went by and dark clouds became ever darker, the song titles began to reflect that, as well: the two outtakes from late '79 are named ʽIce Ageʼ and ʽDead Soulsʼ, respectively. The former has a beat so lively it would rather fit New Order than Joy Division, and the level of energy is so surprisingly high that I am tempted to regard Ian's prophetic exclamations of "living in an ice age, living in an ice age!" as more fit for Bad Religion. ʽDead Soulsʼ, having more to do with the cult of ancestors than Gogol's novel, is slower and more stately and might have fit better on Closer, but the heavy guitars are just... too heavy for this band. Plus, they sort of rip off the bridge section of ʽJumpin' Jack Flashʼ without knowing it.

Chronologically the last song to be included here is ʽThe Sound Of Musicʼ, recorded during the same session as ʽLove Will Tear Us Apartʼ — some lovely scratch guitar sounds here, every now and then breaking off into tortured melodic howls, but no proper vocal hook to speak of... all in all, listening to all these outtakes really makes you respect the band all the more, because lesser outfits (like the abovementioned Cabaret Voltaire, for instance) would have absolutely no problem populating their numerous records with this mediocre production. Joy Division, on the other hand, made sure that only those songs make it to the final line that actually tell a gripping story — these ones mostly don't.

Leaving aside the cover of ʽSister Rayʼ, which is mostly interesting just for the very fact of its existence, we should briefly cover the second disc — of tremendous historical importance, since that was the very last live show the band ever played, at Birmingham University on May 2, 1980. It is notable for containing a rare live version of the soon-to-be New Order song ʽCeremonyʼ, and for closing the concert with ʽDigitalʼ, an old song from the same EP that also contained ʽGlassʼ. It is also notable for featuring highly out-of-tune synths (particularly audible on ʽDecadesʼ), but otherwise the sound quality is tolerable — and, oh joy, they do ʽShadow Playʼ, with Sumner playing all the guitar solos... well, not perfectly, but as close to live perfection as possible. Other than that, well, it was just your average Joy Division live show; if you are interested in whether Ian Curtis gives any signs of sounding like a goner, then no, he does not. It's not like he'd been planning his suicide for months, anyway.

Overall, I would only recommend the album for very serious fans. Sometimes a collection of outtakes such as this, when arranged in chronological order, can very explicitly trace the creative evolution of a band and take you on a journey whose individual moments might not be very exciting, but whose overall arc drops you off at a point from which you can hardly see the begin­ning of the trip. This is not the case here, and not because Joy Division did not develop (on the contrary, their evolution from 1977 to 1980 was almost phenomenal by contemporary standards), but because, as it turns out, «mediocre Joy Division» tend to have a far more monotonous sound than «outstanding Joy Division». You are going to get a lot of inferior relatives of ʽInterzoneʼ and ʽShe's Lost Controlʼ, but you are not going to get any relatives of ʽDecadesʼ or ʽThe Eternalʼ or even ʽDay Of The Lordsʼ. But you are going to get some nifty bass grooves and a few nice guitar chords, and spend an additional 40 minutes (or 80, if you throw in the live album) in the company of the world's most sympathetic 23-year old martyr.

Joy Division: Closer

JOY DIVISION: CLOSER (1980)

1) Atrocity Exhibition; 2) Isolation; 3) Passover; 4) Colony; 5) A Means To An End; 6) Heart And Soul; 7) Twenty Four Hours; 8) The Eternal; 9) Decades.

General verdict: Ian Curtis' Personal Inferno, all nine circles provided.

It may be observed that, unlike the somewhat fanatical adepts of the «hardcore» approach, those bands that started out under the regular punk banners (around 1976-78), unless they simply imploded (like the Sex Pistols), tended to reach their «maturity stage» fairly soon — sometimes very soon, so that you really have to go all the way back to the earliest singles of The Police or The Cure, for instance, to understand where they were coming from. For all these people, the punk revolution ultimately served as a formal pretext, an initial floating lifesaver that helped them get used to the waters. By 1980, punk à la Clash was pretty much as dead as the Kennedys, and in its place we simply had a whole new generation of art-rockers, with new horizons to explore. Some of these original punkers were cautious optimists and dedicated progressives, which led them to experimenting with world music and avantgarde. Others were pessimists and painted their waters squid black, worshipping at the shrine of Jim Morrison but also updating his vision for the contemporary era with its intellectual demand for less clichéd lyrical imagery.

In this context, Joy Division's Closer could be regarded as belonging to the same class as early records by Siouxsie & The Banshees, The Cure, Bauhaus, and numerous lesser acts commonly classified as «doom rock», «Goth», etc., and, in fact, Closer is frequently listed in the higher ranks of lists like «top 20 greatest Goth rock albums». However, as it often happens with trend-setting, genre-defining albums, the intentions behind its release never included setting any trends or defining any genres — everything simply revolved around the songwriting talents of the band members and the inner demons of Ian Curtis, overfed and ready to tear their host body to pieces by early 1980. If anything ever drove the band forward, it was a desire to overstep the boundaries of the formula developed on their previous album. Unknown Pleasures was already a masterpiece behind their belt, but it was really «dark pop», a record on which the songs were still too short, too much influenced by their punkish past, too reliant on classic structure — and so, in the good tradition of art rock, the next record had to focus on the elements that made Joy Dvision what it was, untying all the birthcords. There was no intention to release anything specifically flashy or theatrical, anything image-centered: just a little something that would help them completely stand out from all the rest. They had the experience, and the talent, and the means of production, so why not? They did not even realise at the time that they were all lending Ian Curtis a hand in writing his own musical testament.

With the exact same classic lineup, the exact same producer (Martin Hannett), the exact same record label, and the exact same city of London (only the studio was different), it is amazing just how much textural and melodic difference the band managed to introduce, especially considering that, according to most common sources, they arrived at the studio in March 1980 with no new material whatsoever, and had to work most of the stuff from scratch. Hannett's production values do remain largely the same, with Sumner's guitar having an «industrial» sheen to it and Curtis' vocals retaining a cavernous echo most of the time; not all of the band members were pleased with this, but that is the way the Joy Division sound has gone down in history anyway.

It may seem curious that the album, obviously much less accessible than Unknown Pleasures, ended up selling far better and going as high as #6 on the UK charts (as compared to a ridiculous #71 for Unknown Pleasures). However, there were two external factors that must have predicted the success. First, obviously, was the suicide of Ian Curtis on May 18, which made the reclusive and deranged frontman one of the most talked about people in Britain for a brief while. Second was the release of ʻLove Will Tear Us Apartʼ as a single in June: the song, a bouncy and quite romantic-sounding (never mind the dark thoughts at the core) piece of New Wave pop, became a smash hit, and certified both the ensuing success of Closer (although I do wonder how many people who went out and bought it due to admiration of ʻLove Will Tear Us Apartʼ got themselves quite a nasty shock upon seeing themselves locked in a sonic crypt with Ian's ghost) and, for that matter, the future of the Ian-less Joy Division as New Order. Without these two factors driving up sales, Closer would hardly stand a commercial chance, although critical reception would probably have been rapturous all the same.

Unlike Unknown Pleasures, Closer can take some time to set in properly. The songs are slower, longer, more repetitive, less flashy, and even more dependent on atmosphere — not a comfortable kind of atmosphere, either. A kind of atmosphere created by a 24-year old man with the mind of an 80-year old Dr. Faust, fed up with and let down by all of earthly pleasures, Closer is an album about the end of The World — where The World is understood from a purely personal perspective, and the distinction between The World outside and The World inside the protagonist is completely irrelevant (and, as existentialist philosophers like to tell you anyway, there can be no difference established between «the end of me» and «the end of the universe»). This is the kind of musical album that Schopenhauer might have produced, were he a musician in the rock era, and not everybody wants to feel like Schopenhauer. In a way, I guess, you'd have to put yourself into an Ian Curtis frame of mind in order to completely «get» and «savor» the record, and that might not end well.

Although the record did not originate as an intentionally conceptional suite, common thematic threads run through all of it, and the overall flow is near perfect. The first song tells us that "this is the way, step inside", and there is little doubt as to the location of the place to which we are invited: Sumner's guitar lines, consisting mostly of frantical industrial scraping, suggest incessant suffering and torture, while Morris plays a complex, but fully robotic percussive pattern that suggests some merciless cog grind — this is Hell, either literally so, or just the private Hell in Ian's own mind (remember, there's really no difference). There is a formalistic explanation of ʻAtrocity Exhibitionʼ — about how it was influenced by the works of J. G. Ballard, and how Ian's lyrics summarize his «condensed novel» approach — but it would hardly make sense if Ian was just writing about J. G. Ballard and not himself. Maybe Sumner, who, as he himself would confess later, often missed the point of Curtis' words, did take the inspiration for those grating avantgarde guitar parts from J. G. Ballard, but in any case, they fully agree with — at least, they are extremely symbolic of — Ian's state of mind at the time, and the track is a perfect intro to whatever follows, even if it is hardly among my favorites (for lack of subtlety).

What follows is a huge tract of emotional wasteland, formally divided into separate tracks but setting more or less the same mood. If Joy Division were merely a backing band for Curtis, things would have been difficult: Curtis was more of a poet than a songwriter, and probably even more of a poet than a singer (despite the eerie similarities of his low voice with Jim Morrison's, he could do fewer things with it, and could never have as much power or precision as Jim at his best). Fortunately, though, the band members were interested in setting Ian's poetry to inventive music, and after a while, when you have had your big fill of Curtis and your attention begins drifting away towards the instruments, you will probably see how different the songs are from each other. Melodic ideas and cool combinations of ideas are everywhere — look at the awesome contrast between the heavy, doom-laden bass line and the Kraftwerk-ian synthesizer lead line of ʻIsolationʼ; revel in the menacing snap of the bass melody of ʻPassoverʼ (the little swoop at the end of the main four-note riff seems like a helldog biting at the protagonist's trousers); acknowledge the jagged angular roughness of the post-punk guitar/bass duet of ʻColonyʼ; feel the thrilling suspense of the soft, but inescapably dangerous bass pattern of ʻHeart And Soulʼ, around which the synthesizers quietly moan and groan in a ghostly fashion... I could go on, but the fact is, despite setting similar moods, all these tracks have their individual voices as well. And it's not that easy — in the case of The Cure, for instance, it took them almost a decade to make each song on a given album ring out with its own voice (Joy Division took less than two).

With all this melodic brilliance in sight — and I do mean brilliance: Hook's bass work, in particular, should rank among the world's finest exercises in meaningful minimalistic melodicity — it is almost reluctantly that we turn again to Curtis and his demons, but they do complete the picture, and the best tracks on the album are still the ones where he manages to give a particularly memorable performance. On ʻColonyʼ, for instance, a song about the slashing cruelty of loneliness, the climactic part arrives with Ian's screams of "God in his wisdom took you by the hand, God in his wisdom made you understand!..." — that's when he realizes that it is the will of God that he endure that cruelty, and makes it felt with all the desperation that he can muster (again, Jim Morrison, with his overall stronger physique, could have made that sound even more powerful, but give the kid a break). On ʻHeart And Soulʼ, on the contrary, he quiets down his voice to match the equally quiet menace of the music, and the chorus mantra of "heart and soul, one will burn" becomes one of the most chilling moments in Joy Division history. The song never really rises above the volume of eerie whisper, but you can easily sense that fire and brimstone are just around the corner, all the time. (I particularly like how this is hinted at by the sudden increase in volume of Morris' drumming at 5:06 — just as the song begins to fade out... it's like they're sparing you the actual meeting with the rapidly approaching Doom, so in the end you can only fantasize about how that one would have looked).

For all of the atmospherics, though, Closer is actually a much more energetic and rocking record than it emerges out of all the verbal descriptions — the first seven tracks are all based on loud drum patterns, fast-rolling bass grooves, distorted riffage, or, in the case of ʻIsolationʼ, synth-pop hooks, so it is largely the sameness of mood and the relatively slow tempos that are responsible for its dirgey reputation. And, of course, the last two songs. ʻThe Eternalʼ stands out as the band's most ambitious dig into The Transcendental: the song moves on slowly and gravely, like a silent funerary procession in the days of The Black Plague, to the electronic instrumental hum that imitates medievalistic choir singing, over which we superimpose the Dark Angel piano melody — and Curtis' quietest, softest, and scariest singing ever: there are but two verses, one of which describes the "procession", and the second of which turns to the narrator itself ("cry like a child, though these years make me older...") — meaning that the "procession" is really an allegory, as the hero is witnessing his own funeral in his head. This solemn atmosphere (created by the most minimal means) is only matched by ʻDecadesʼ, where the band goes for a bit of a crescendo effect to create a grand finale — after all, here Ian is trying to speak up for his entire generation ("here are the young men, well where have they been?"), implying that his own troubles are, perhaps, everybody's troubles. There's no particular bombast, merely a few minor key keyboard overdubs that collectively create and gradually amplify the ultimate feel of desolation and hopelessness and complete the album's journey from initial pictures of cruelty and brutality to final sentiments of coldness and death-in-life.

In short, this is Ian's personal journey through his own version of the Nine Circles of Hell, and you could probably attach a special name to each one — just off the top of my head, here's a try: Cruelty (ʻAtrocity Exhibitionʼ), Loneliness (ʻIsolationʼ), Madness (ʻPassoverʼ), Seclusion (ʻColo­nyʼ), Disillusionment (ʻA Means To An Endʼ), Fatalism (ʻHeart And Soulʼ), Agony (ʻTwenty Four Hoursʼ), Mourning (ʻThe Eternalʼ), and, finally, Cosmic Grief (ʻDecadesʼ). In other words, a fairly jolly party record, this one — do not forget to bring it to all the birthdays and weddings you are invited to, just to remind people of, you know, that other side of the coin.

On the critical side — like most of the «grand statement» albums made by young, barely experienced, artists with limited musical training, Closer inevitably suffers from the «grasp exceeding the grip» factor. Where Unknown Pleasures, for all its individuality and innovation, was still very much a pop album, firmly grounded in punk aesthetics, and did not require a lot of musical experience, Closer moves into the ambitious fields of art rock, where the technical limitations of the players and the singer become felt much more acutely. Thus, the songs tend to be long, but the groove never changes, and unless you manage to fall under its hypnotic spell really quickly, the probability of getting bored soon begins to grow exponentially. I remember it well myself, how Unknown Pleasures used to feel entertaining, whereas Closer just had too many yawn-inducing moments, and, indeed, even now I think that at least some of these tracks are better appreciated on a symbolic / intellectual level than on gut feeling level (ʻAtrocity Exhibitionʼ is amazingly well constructed, but I still believe it makes you think of torture chambers rather than feel yourself inside one). And while Ian's singing in general clearly comes from the heart and is well compatible with the sonic textures of the album, I do admit that it is all on a one-way street, and I would certainly have welcomed more tracks on which he deviates from the «Prophet Ezekiel» formula (like ʻThe Eternalʼ).

Not everybody is a fan of Martin Hannett's production, either (even Sumner himself used to grumble that he'd committed the same mistakes here that he did on Unknown Pleasures). On the whole, the claustrophobic, echo-laden sound, where you seem to be trapped in some underground bunker and the voice of Ian comes to you from the cracks of the concrete ceiling above, seems to be the right kind of sound for Joy Division in general and Closer in particular. But ever so often, it gives the album a lo-fi, homebrewn feel that does not ideally agree with the personal apocalypse grandiosity of the design, and I can't help wondering whether ʻAtrocity Exhibitionʼ or ʻColonyʼ would not have sounded even more impressive and devastating in the hands of some other producer (like Daniel Lanois, for instance). Not that it does not have a unique sound — in a way, it is one of the sounds that pretty much defined the post-punk era — but I am not completely sure that it is the kind of sound that would ideally reflect whatever was going on in the mind of the band's frontman. Though it did come... closer.

In light of a recent relisten to Nirvana's Nevermind, it makes sense to compare the «living death fantasies» of Ian Curtis and Kurt Cobain — different tempers, different musical preferences, but ultimately similar goals and purposes. Of course, Joy Division's take on the issue of emotional necrosis is much more subtle than Nirvana's — far more symbolist and complex lyrics, subtler sonic techniques, lack of direct gut appeal to a mass teen audience — and this is why appreciating Closer requires a much more refined taste (fortunately for me, my own understanding of how to appreciate it has not in any way decreased my fondness for the more «populist» approach of Nirvana), and, on the whole, probably goes better with a small volume of Kierkegaard or Nietzsche than the collected works of William S. Burroughs. But on the other hand, there might be a much easier way to enjoy it without any formal academic preparation. The only thing you really have to do is to purge your mind (for a while) of all positive thoughts, shut out the sunlight, and stare at that album cover for a few minutes, all the while asking yourself the question: «How would it feel to be buried alive in something like that?». And then you just press play... and the next morning, nothing really looks the same any more.

Sidenote / post-scriptum: The 2007 special edition of the album adds an entire bonus disc of a live show recorded on February 8, 1980, at the University of London Union, where the band was already debuting a large chunk of titles from Closer, mixed with various oddities (curiously, only one song from Unknown Pleasures) and played to dedicated and highly supportive fans (which you can tell not merely by the fact of continuous applause, but also by shouts of people requesting ʻLove Will Tear Us Apartʼ from the front rows — a song that had not yet even been released officially). The sound quality is fairly awful (clearly not a soundboard recording), and on the whole, material from Closer does not easily lend itself to live performance by a small band (ʻThe Eternalʼ suffers worst of all, primarily due to the lack of piano), but the show still remains a priceless historical artifact.

Friday, January 5, 2018

Joy Division: Unknown Pleasures

JOY DIVISION: UNKNOWN PLEASURES (1979)

1) Disorder; 2) Day Of The Lords; 3) Candidate; 4) Insight; 5) New Dawn Fades; 6) She's Lost Control; 7) Shadowplay; 8) Wilderness; 9) Interzone; 10) I Remember Nothing.

General verdict: The absolute best that New Wave has to offer in the neural shock department.

For all the negative energy released during the punk / New Wave «silver age» of rock music, it probably took the movement a good two or three years before it started generating genuinely bleek, depressed, when-will-it-end sort of music. The punk crowds protested in hopes of a better life, the early post-punks went beyond that by deconstructing the very idea of protest itself, and for all the seriousness of Talking Heads' scenic image, the complexity, symbolism, and humor of their music never left much space for genuine terror or depression. Looking back at the big critical and commercial successes of 1977-78, I can find surprisingly few, if any, examples of records that suppressed, rather than nurtured, hope and optimism (maybe some of Patti Smith's material could be quoted, and the first albums of Siouxsie & The Banshees, but on the whole, Patti Smith is really just as idealistic as most of us, and Siouxsie were too much of a theatrical act in the first place). Not that, God forbid, there's anything particularly wrong with that, but great changing times do call for great tragic artistic outlooks, and just as the Flower Power age in 1967 sorely needed its Doors for balance, so did the revamped musical world of 1979.

That the band ultimately named itself «Joy Division», referring to the Jewish girls in House of Dolls, was not itself very indicative, considering the frequent fascination of punk bands, beginning with the Sex Pistols, with various Nazi imagery, for shocking allegorical purposes. However, once you actually give it some thought, this particular allegory becomes fairly frightening, and, if you ask me, the name choice and Ian Curtis' suicide are both rooted in pretty much the same psychological processes. As long as the band was still named «Warszaw», they mostly played routine, derivative punk stuff; the name change was accompanied with a major stylistic shift, as they toned down the raw energy in favor of extra heaviness and bleakness — the kind of music that still took its foundation from contemporary punk bands, but its spirit from Jim Morrison. In doing so, Joy Division opened more than just the doors — the floodgates for legions of bands in their wake: post-punk, Goth, grunge, alt-rock, emo, you name it, they all owe some sort of debt to Ian Curtis and his bandmates. Some of that influence may have become more strongly appreciated in retrospect, but the fact remains that, at the time of their existence, Joy Division simply had no competition in whatever it was they were doing, and in the end, as you investigate the roots of modern pop bleakness, it all comes down to Unknown Pleasures, whether you want it or not.

Recorded over the first two weeks of April 1979, in Stockport's Strawberry Studios — originally set up by founding members of 10cc and so named in honor of ʻStrawberry Fields Foreverʼ, although this bit of trivia is unlikely to provide any insight into the genesis of Joy Division's music (there's not much in common that it shares with 10cc, anyway) — Unknown Pleasures involved only the band members themselves, plus just one additional musician — the band's producer Martin Hannett, who contributed some synthesizer parts and was largely responsible for the overall claustrophobic sound of the record (allegedly, not too admired by the band members themselves, who were displeased that the studio record came out quite removed from the raw-aggressive sound of their live performances, but time has shown pretty strongly who was wrong and who was right about that). The music itself largely followed the classic Doors scheme: Ian Curtis as the lyricist / vocalist / «shaman», and the three bandmates actually writing and recording the music around his shamanism, with but a few minor exceptions.

Chart impact of the album was minimal (#71 on the UK charts, and not released overseas at all), not so much because the people were scared of the sound as due to complete lack of promotion: the band did not even put out any singles to accompany the record. (Closer would be far more fortunate, but its popularity was unquestionably much boosted by Ian's fate: cynically speaking, nothing like a good suicide to get your songs to sell). Contemporary reviews were largely positive, but still, to a large degree the legend of Unknown Pleasures and Joy Division in general was cultivated a posteriori, and the record's final deification must have taken place somewhere around the early 1990s, when depressed grungers and alt-rockers kicked out 1980s' hedonism and became the new flagbearers of guitar-based popular music. That does not mean that the impact of the music on contemporary musicians wasn't huge — if not for Joy Division, we probably wouldn't have The Cure the way we know them, or Bauhaus (or, for that matter, a large chunk of the Russian rock music scene, with Kino, the Russian national icon of rock music, often described as «Russia's Joy Division», with a modicum of truth to that). But yes, in terms of overnight popularity Joy Division could never match The Doors, although that may not so much be an indication of relative quality as it was of the relative difference between musical attitudes in 1967 and 1979.

Like all great artists, Joy Division made their music stand out so much because of skillful and inspired synthesis and «fertilization»: most of Unknown Pleasures sounds like the joint work of loyal and arduous disciples of Jim Morrison, Tony Iommi, and Tom Verlaine. Indeed, the similarity between the voices of Curtis and Morrison is so uncanny that I can easily imagine people in 1979 catching echoes of Joy Division songs on some underground radio station and going «JIM??!! I knew there was something fishy about that heart attack story!» — in fact, I do believe that one of the reasons why the man switched to different vocal registers so often on Closer may have been related to the desire to establish his own, fully independent vocal style. But even so, that is no flaw — the musical structures and arrangements are so different from The Doors that only professional haters could ever accuse the music of being a rip-off. It is not a rip-off; it is contemporary punk music, inseminated once again with elements of «old school» pop and hard rock, yet at the same time also looking to the future.

It is hardly a coincidence that the album opens with a few bars of Stephen Morris' drums, because the electronic drum sound happens to be one of the album's calling cards. Punk bands at the time preferred it raw, and «electronic drumming» was still a novelty, usually reserved for the likes of highly experimental artists; on Unknown Pleasures, you get this slightly «plasticized» drum sound all over the place, and the rest of the instruments sort of follow the drum lead — guitars and bass are all heavily processed, courtesy of Hannett and his extensive use of modulators, echo effects and various experimental production techniques. Pretty soon, that kind of sound, with new technologies revered and abused, would become a suffocating norm, but in 1979, it was still relatively novel, and it gives the record a unique dual personality — it's like «Kraftwerk meets The Clash», where at the musical core you have an energetic rock'n'roll band, but then they are placed in this «force field», as if you were watching them play their energetic rock'n'roll in a small containment area permeated with ion radiation or something. It's like... well, like something you'd probably do if you were playing «classic rock» and yet you hated the idea of having your music go to classic rock radio stations. I am not even sure myself that I actively «love» this decision, but to deny its artistic purpose and potential effectiveness would be highly unjust.

In a way, Unknown Pleasures still preserves elements of «transition» from the band's (and New Wave's in general) earliest days to the classic age. The first song, ʻDisorderʼ, is still something that you could — in a different arrangement, of course — theoretically imagine on a record by, if not The Clash, then at least The Adverts or some other intellectually-searching punk band of the times. But already the second track, ʻDay Of The Lordsʼ — the first of the album's several mini-masterpieces — kills off all excitement and sets you up for an atmosphere of ponderous gloom. My favorite part are the first thirty seconds — the introduction, where, to the sound of a jangly-droning guitar and a threateningly ascending bass part, you make your final climb, only to see below, with the thrash of one doom-laden power chord at 0:21 into the song, the terrifying wasteland panorama of that particular circle of Hell to which you have been assigned. The lyrics are, indeed, speaking of eternal torment — here on Earth, which makes the whole thing even scarier: Sumner's creepy, Sabbath-influenced riffage and Ian's stone-faced "where will it end? where will it end?", delivered with a frightening mix of Biblical solemnity and personal pain, have nothing «theatrical» about them, and I can hardly make myself apply the «Goth» moniker to it because most «Goth» music/art implies a certain amount of theatrical symbolism, whereas here, the music and the voice are all alive with the spirits of real demons inhabiting the band's frontman, and occasionally infecting his crewmates as well.

Actually, nowhere is this infection as vividly evident as (let us skip a few titles for the moment) on what has always been my favorite track on the album — ʻShadowplayʼ, a song that most perfectly combines the frontman's «determination-flowing-into-desperation» attitude with a well-oiled rock band's speed and tightness. There's the never-faltering bassline that keeps you pinned to the seat all the way through; there's the odd percussion effect when, after each culminating fill, the drums somehow «explode» as if the drumsticks were loaded, Keith Moon-style, with real gunpowder; there's the lyrics that you can interpret in a thousand specific ways, but all of them have to do with irretrievable loss of all hope and ideals. But most importantly, there is that guitar solo, first echoing the vocal lines, then temporarily exploding into maniacal white noise, and finally, towards the very end, skyrocketing into the atmosphere like a last desperate cry for help or, perhaps, like a musical banshee into which the protagonist's spirit ended up transforming. Odd enough, the closest musical analogy here that I can think of is neither punk music nor The Doors, but the fast-paced final section of Fleetwood Mac's ʻThe Chainʼ — which may very well have been an influence, especially if you think how much that hysterically ascending final guitar part is reminiscent of Lindsey Buckingham's playing style; and, for that matter, no guitar player ever succeeded better than Lindsey at inducing an atmosphere of hysterical depression (remember ʻI'm So Afraidʼ?), so I'd be very much surprised to learn that the similarity was just a coincidence. Also, to truly appreciate the power of ʻShadowplayʼ it helps to listen to The Killers' cover of the song, thirty years later — technically competent, yes, but with about 0.5% of the emotion expressed here in Ian's vocals and in Bernard's guitar playing.

While the rest of the album has always paled a bit to me next to these two highlights, it is only because all the other songs have to scale almost unscalable heights of emotionality; but each of them tells its own story, all of them connected with a single thread but showing their own peculiarities. Sabbath influence echoes once again on ʻNew Dawn Fadesʼ, whose opening riff is reminiscent of Iommi's work on ʻN.I.B.ʼ — remember that superficially corny tale of the Devil and his bride, through which Tony and Ozzy actually delivered shades of eternal loneliness, worthy of Lermontov's poem? Here, there is no Devil in actual sight, but there is just as strong an aura of eternal damnation, generated by means of a relentless bass pulse, a nerve-rattling guitar drone, those «intentionally lifeless» drums, and Curtis' solemn singing, gradually increasing in volume and hysteria but never losing its romantic nobility — highly moving. Then there's a bunch of tales from the madhouse — ʻCandidateʼ and ʻShe's Lost Controlʼ, the latter sung from the outside point of view of a terrified observer and the former from the inside point of view of the committed patient; note that in none of these cases does Curtis ever stoop to blood-curdling screaming or barking — the point of Joy Division is to stay as cold as possible most of the time, to embody a state of absolute calm as the best equivalent for total spiritual chaos. Something much harder to do effectively, by the way, than the grinding madhouse of The Birthday Party; and, who knows, there might be something far more terrifying in the quiet resignation of Ian Curtis than in the wild exhortations of Nick Cave (at least, early Nick Cave).

But we should not forget, either, that Unknown Pleasures is not just, or even not so much a multi-movement philosophical statement as it is a collection of short, catchy pop songs — okay, so it is both at the same time, and without being both at the same time, it could have never achieved its current status. I mean, ʻInterzoneʼ, one of the loudest and punkiest songs here, is just so darn catchy, isn't it? Great garage-rock riff, high intensity, and that strange mantra of "I was looking for a friend of mine", delivered hurriedly and out of breath as if the singer owed us a quick explanation (please do not bother, Mr. Curtis; it might be in our best interests to remain uninformed about this particular friend of yours). The droning guitar/bass riffs of ʻInsightʼ and ʻShe's Lost Controlʼ, the odd broken patters of ʻWildernessʼ, the simple, but curiously optimistic power pop melody of ʻDisorderʼ (like I said, pretty much the only song here that is hiding under the belly of the Depression Train rather than riding first class), it's all cool from a simply musical standpoint, even if without Curtis' presence some of these tracks might have gelled together. And then there is the production — all those endless sound effects, incessant bits of clanging, scraping, factory puffing, and above all — breaking, breaking, breaking, culminating in the shattered glass soundbits of ʻI Remember Nothingʼ. It would be way too much of a stretch to call Unknown Pleasures an industrial album, but it was certainly influenced by early industrial experimentation, and put all those exciting, but much abused ideas by Throbbing Gristle and early Cabaret Voltaire to effective work in a pop setting way before Depeche Mode succeeded in monetizing them.

It would be a stretch to insist that all the melodies here are 100% original and emotionally resonant. Occasionally, it is the production that makes them come across as such: quite a few of the song structures do not stray far away from generic punk riffage, and for every fine touch like the Ramones-worthy riff of ʻInterzoneʼ there is a ʻWildernessʼ where the stop-and-start bits are attention-attracting, but the verse melody is really just a power chord mess (which still does not spoil the song too bad, because there is a compensatory mesmerizing bassline out there, and Curtis — well, Curtis is almost always compensatorily mesmerizing). ʻI Remember Nothingʼ almost has no melody at all — just a metronomic rhythm pattern, strewn across with seemingly randomized funky lead phrasing, fully dependent on production tricks and atmosphere (in a way not too dissimilar to ʻThe Endʼ by The Doors, and you could easily see the song extended from its six minutes to twelve in order to match Morrison's epicness; considering that they had plenty of space left on the LP, they probably did not do it just so that they wouldn't be written off as total Doors clones).

Theoretically, one could also complain about the monotonousness of the single permeating mood here; but that argument would ring hollow, since, as I said, there are many different shades to that mood (ranging from the moderately uplifting variety of ʻDisorderʼ to the detached-descriptive attitude of ʻShe's Lost Controlʼ to the utter hell of ʻDay Of The Lordsʼ), and besides, you do not really opt for diversity on an album whose main theme could be simplistically defined as «real Hell is inside you, and you'll be taking it with you wherever you go», so why even bring it up?

As far as I'm concerned, there was not a single LP out there before Unknown Pleasures that said "I'm in eternal pain with no hope of a better end" as explicitly, honestly, and with so much style. If you think this is an exaggeration, let me remind you that this statement is not necessarily a compliment — saying something, period, is not quite the same as saying it well, and in certain cases, too, it is better to shut up than it is to speak. In particular, the musical backbone of Pleasures is visibly straining from the psychological overload, and even with the astute help of the producer, the melodic content is not always fully adequate to the task, considering that, after all, nobody in the band at the time had too much composing or playing experience. Later on, Robert Smith's team would take this music to new heights of professionalism — but The Cure were very much about "Depression Theater", whereas Unknown Pleasures has the seemingly clear benefit of reflecting reality (and it is rather pointless to ask yourself the question, "would we think the same way if Curtis did not hang himself?", because the odds of Curtis making the record and not hanging himself should have been assessed as minuscule even back then).

So while I am not sure that Unknown Pleasures is the most depressing (or, rather, depressed) album ever made, I am sure that it is the most depressed album ever made by the most depressed frontman who ever set himself the goal to record the most depressed album there ever was. Its greatness, like almost any greatness, does not follow directly from that — more from a fortunate mix of circumstances, which placed this tormented frontman in the company of several talented musicians and an understanding producer in a general age of musical change and artistic innovation — but still, its major asset is in how well it expresses one man's emotional turmoil. It is influenced by a decade of «mope rock», yes, but where so many later dark-themed records, though superficially good, end up feeling like «Oh, I just listened to Joy Division and I decided to make some really depressed music, too», Unknown Pleasures never feels like «oh, I just listened to some Morrison and I thought, hey, this New Wave era of ours still doesn't have its own Morrison, so let's hurry up before somebody beats us to it!» It just feels like the state of mind of somebody for whom the world has already ended, and even if his bandmates are slightly lagging behind to reflect that feeling, the averaged result is still a timeless memento of what it feels like to be living a life with no purpose.