BOB DYLAN: BLOOD ON THE TRACKS (1975)
1) Tangled Up In Blue; 2)
Simple Twist Of Fate; 3) You're A Big Girl Now; 4) Idiot Wind; 5) You're Gonna
Make Me Lonesome When You Go; 6) Meet Me In The Morning; 7) Lily, Rosemary And
The Jack Of Hearts; 8) If You See Her, Say Hello; 9) Shelter From The Storm;
10) Buckets Of Rain.
I must say, I have never been much fond of the
title of this album — seems altogether more suitable for a Slayer than a Bob
Dylan LP. Not only is ʽbloodʼ a fairly strong word for Bob, but the title also
works towards a very straightforward understanding of the record, namely, that
the tracks are indeed figuratively soaked in his blood, that is, convey his
genuine spiritual pain like nothing has ever conveyed it before. The mask is
dropped, the barriers removed, the cabbalistic verbal fog cleared, here is
Robert Zimmerman, and here is a pint of his own blood that he offers you to
drink up like some modern day Jesus. Real strong hemoglobin and all.
That Dylan's family problems and divorce case
have provided inspiration for these songs seems quite obvious; much less obvious, when you really start
thinking about it, is this idea of a Dylan freely opening his heart and mind to
the general public, allowing to connect on a much more intimate level than
before. The greatest advantage of Blood
On The Tracks is not so much its «sincerity», about which we can really
only guess, as its «accessibility». Planet
Waves had already introduced a serious change to Dylan's lyrical style,
and here it is carried even further — even if not all the lyrics begin to make
sense, all of them at least give a feeling
of making sense. The air is still clouded with thick metaphors and allegories,
but they heartily invite interpretations: "beauty walks a razor's edge,
someday I'll make it mine" does make one ponder its possible meaning much
more effectively than "six white horses that you did promise were finally
delivered down to the penitentiary", if you know what I mean.
Subsequently, there has always been, and will
always be, two camps of Dylan fans: the Blonde
On Blonde camp and the Blood On The
Tracks camp (there is also a separate Highway
61 Revisited camp, but that is a different talk altogether — it is mostly
populated by people who like an angrier, dirtier, kick-ass-er, rock'n'rollish
Bob Dylan). The «BOB» camp appreciates Dylan for the enigma, the unexplainable
magic; the «BOT» camp worships him for the revelation, the suffering humanism.
The camps are not forever fixed in place — normally, the case is that every
once in a while, somebody «achieves a higher degree of illumination» and
defects from the BOT camp to the BOB camp, but I have also seen opposite cases,
where haughty young people would snub BOT for its relative simplicity and
triviality, then gradually, over the years, succumb to its charms and renounce
their trendy elitism of old.
Amusingly, though, it's not as if there weren't
anything in common between those two records. Listen closely to ʽIdiot Windʼ
and you will see that it amply borrows from ʽOne Of Us Must Know (Sooner Or
Later)ʼ — not just the same organ tone, but even some of the same melodic
moves: "I couldn't believe, after all these years..." is pretty much
the same line as "I didn't realize, just what I could hear...". It is
only when you see these little occasional shake-hands between songs that you
understand — this whole «feud» is completely pointless, and rests entirely on
flimsy subjective impressions, liable to change with every next blow of the
wind.
Overall, Blood
On The Tracks happens to have a more «serious» tone, showing none of the
sense of humor that could either attract or repel in the case of songs like
ʽRainy Day Womenʼ or ʽLeopard-Skin Pill-Box Hatʼ; and it also happens to be a
little more «stripped» in terms of arrangements, with no traces of brass and,
more importantly, very little electric guitar presence (ʽMeet Me In The Morningʼ
is the only song here with a loud electric lead part). These factors create the
impression of intimacy / personality / altogether confessional atmosphere,
which charms the pants off the souls of so many people, but how close that
impression is to the «truth», we will never know. All we know is that, for the
first time since Blonde On Blonde,
Bob has given us a collection of songs that punch hard and reach deep — a
similar «soul transfusion» from one vessel to another (John Wesley Harding I judge on a different level — more like a
meaning-of-life-style type of global mystery that is much bigger than the
singer and the listener taken together).
It's a good thing, too, that he let go of The
Band for those sessions, as they had turned out to be more of an encumbrance
than a blessing on Planet Waves.
Although the final credits list quite a lot of different people taking part in
the recordings, they are all split in two different bands — one backing him up
in New York, another providing local services in Minneapolis, where he re-recorded
several of the tracks — and the only thing that technically separates Blood On The Tracks from the ascetic
sounds of John Wesley Harding is a
near-constant keyboard presence (some of those provided by Paul Griffin, who'd
previously played with Bob on parts of the Blonde
On Blonde sessions, for that matter).
Bob's own acoustic guitar playing is at the
heart of every single song on here, and it looks as if he'd been taking lessons
— just take a look at ʽBuckets Of Rainʼ, for instance, which could have easily
worked as an instrumental (some of the chords sound like they came right off
the Pat Garrett soundtrack, which,
for that matter, was no slouch in playing terms either). The album is really
only marginally louder and denser than his early acoustic stuff, but it still
produces a much «fuller» feeling, both because the guitar is treated more like
a musical instrument than a «partner for comfort», and also because of the
production — credited to Bob himself, by the way, which was a first for the
man, and now we know how Bob wants his own records to sound: soft, deep, and
with just a small touch of echo on the vocals so that it doesn't sound too homely and cozy. He's not exactly
calling out to us from the lower depths, but he's distanced himself a bit so we
no longer have to smell each other's socks or anything.
As for the songs themselves — these are not
really «songs» as usual. These are magic incantations: mantras, whose
repetitiveness is brought upfront and shoved in your face, take it or leave it.
Notice how most of the song titles form sentences or at least complex phrases,
and then inavoidably conclude or constitute each chorus, so that you have them
memorized upon first listen: ʽTangled Up In Blueʼ, ʽSimple Twist Of Fateʼ,
ʽYou're A Big Girl Nowʼ and so on. This can be no mere coincidence — it can
only reflect a maniacal desire to hammer these statements inside our heads, and
it could be seriously irritating if only these mantras, taken all together, did
not form such an awesome kaleidoscope of their author's state of mind.
Side A: ʽTangled Up In Blueʼ opens the show
with fuss / irritation / confusion, as the title would suggest. ʽSimple Twist
Of Fateʼ is melancholic introspection — something that happens once the nerves
calm down and one takes some time to reflect on all the damage done. ʽYou're A
Big Girl Nowʼ is all sorrow and tears, held back as much as possible but still
showing. ʽIdiot Windʼ brings on scorn, rage and curses (good thing for Bob he
put in that last "we are idiots, babe" chorus, including himself in
the guilty party, or else this might have become his most misogynistic song ever). ʽYou're Gonna Make Me Lonesomeʼ
brings on more sorrow, but now it is subtly hidden under a veil of bouncy
retro-folk, just like them old jigsters did it in pre-war times.
Side B: ʽMeet Me In The Morningʼ throws in some
acid intonations with a nod to the 12-bar blues form. ʽIf You See Her, Say
Helloʼ is like an older, creakier, wrinklier brother to ʽGirl From The North
Countryʼ: the girl has now moved to Tangier, but she can still look him up if
she's got the time. ʽShelter From The Stormʼ, however, concludes the album on
an almost unexpectedly optimistic note — consolation, redemption, basic human
care, no need to commit suicide after all. ʽBuckets Of Rainʼ acts like an
epilogue that pretty much summarises everything about the album: "Life is
sad / Life is a bust / All ya can do / Is do what you must / You do what you
must do and you do it well / I do it for you honey baby can't you tell?".
Yes we can.
I have omitted ʽLily, Rosemary And The Jack Of
Heartsʼ from the list, as you can see, because even after years and years and
years of listening, I still cannot quite understand what this song is doing on
an album like this, other than functioning as «that one song that shouldn't fit in because no Bob Dylan
album can be that predictable». Its
complicated, twisted story should have rather been saved for a Traveling
Wilburys album or something like that — nor is it even melodically interesting
or just plain funny (like a ʽBob Dylan's 115th Dreamʼ). But some people like
it, and some even think it belongs — if only in its role of a thick question
mark. Of course, it also has to be the longest song on the album, goes without
saying.
As usual, the album thrives on Bob's little
perks and twists — mantras are mantras, sure enough, but he never forgets to
vary his intonation from chorus to chorus, so that no two tangled up in blues
or simple twists of fate sound exactly the same way: within each of the
specified moods there are further teensy-weensy mini-moods, and indeed, it all easily
makes up for one of Bob's most realistic-looking performances. (Then again,
reality as such is rarely that exciting). In addition, ʽIdiot Windʼ is really
the last time ever we would see such
a fulminating, life-threatening Bob without a trace of elderly whine or lyrical
banality — feel free to enjoy every second of its eight minutes, and
particularly the haughty-snotty irony of the final protracted vowel in
"sweet lady", which I personally enjoy in a masochistic way: it is
Bob's equivalent of a condescending grin to his audience, and I, for one,
humbly acknowledge his right to it. Besides, "we are idiots, babe, it's a
wonder we can even feed ourselves" is a suitable conclusion to those eight
minutes, and one that only gets stronger and stronger with each passing year.
As a sidenote, I would also like to commend
Tony Brown, the little-known bass player on the New York sessions, for perfectly
guessing the vibe of the album and providing a wonderfully restrained, but
meaningful, counterpoint for the man — particularly on ʽSimple Twist Of Fateʼ, whose
pensive atmosphere is largely due to his laconic plucking, and on ʽShelter From
The Stormʼ, whose repetitiveness might get a little wearisome if there weren't
any extra meat added to Bob's strumming (the bass actually plays a more
complicated melody, and it is almost joyfully danceable in places, again, well
in touch with the redemptive mood of the song).
Winding down on this: if somebody wanted me to formally
narrow my choice of «best Dylan album» to one, Blood On The Tracks would have to be left out for several reasons —
the simplest of which would be that he was 34 years old at the time, and we
should never trust anybody over 30, or, more accurately speaking, the «gold»
layer of Dylan's talent was already depleted in the mid-Sixties. Blood On The Tracks is not particularly
«unique» — it is well within the paradigm of introspective folk-based
singer-songwriters, and there may be Neil Young or Joni Mitchell albums lying
around that would be ready to give it battle in terms of depth, melodicity, and
consistency. In fact, the follow-up to Blood
On The Tracks would, surprisingly enough, superate it as far as sheer
boldness and experimentalism are concerned.
But on the other hand, the album is unique — it is Bob Dylan's «great humanistic
record», relating to his mid-Sixties stuff much the same way as Dark Side Of The Moon relates to
Barrett-era Pink Floyd: more accessible, more compatible with «the flow», less
mysterious and enigmatic, and if these aren't virtues by themselves, they sure
as heck ain't flaws, either. Always nice to see a man explore so many different
corners of the human soul in one well-focused sweep (and then blow it all away
without giving a damn on ʽLily, Rosemary, And The Jack Of Heartsʼ) — and too
bad he never even came close to repeating this feat again: bleakness,
depression, paranoia, and, occasionally, Jesus would soon enough get the better
of him, and we would never again see the same ideal balance, where for every
sob of ʽYou're A Big Girl Nowʼ there would be a snarl of ʽIdiot Windʼ, and for
every confused and insecure ʽTangled Up In Blueʼ there would be an optimistic
and consolatory ʽShelter From The Stormʼ. Thumbs up, of course — not forgetting the album
sleeve, where our hero gets himself a Byron/Chopin-sort of early 19th century
romantic profile (or should we say Mendelssohn for accuracy?). Suits the songs
just fine, I'd say.
Check "Blood On The Tracks" (CD) on Amazon
Check "Blood On The Tracks" (MP3) on Amazon
"Idiot Wind" connects with me on multiple levels. Emotionally, the angry bitterness in calling people idiots resonates when I'm unhappy with their words and actions. On the same token, the self-directed "we're idiots, babe," likewise hits home when I feel the same about myself. From a performance standpoint, His pronunciation is typically weird, intoning a strange Creole reading: Eeee-yeh-dee-oh Wee-in'.
ReplyDeleteBuckets of Rain also connects with me, probably for its old-timey melody and style. For many people it's the weakest track, probably for the same reason.
"or should we say Mendelssohn for accuracy?"
ReplyDeleteByron definitely.
http://www.saleoilpaintings.com/oil-painting/thomas-sully-lord-byron.html
Besides the fact that Mendelssohn and Chopin were composers and Dylan not, so M and C wrote more notes in one piece of work than D in his entire career, while Byron was a colleague poet, Mendelssohn was bourgeois. I don't think you would call Dylan bourgeois.
It seems to me that George's purpose in this latest set of reviews, besides simply documenting his current opinion, is to demonstrate that Bob Dylan WAS indeed a composer. (To say he didn't "write" notes is only true if you take "write" to mean physically writing something down, as opposed to creating something that previously didn't exist.)
DeleteShame on me. "Was". IS a composer.
DeleteI think the "accuracy" comment had more to do with Zimmerman and Mendelssohn's Jewish heritage.
ReplyDeleteAlso, Dylan definitely had a bourgeois upbringing, if more petite than Mendelssohn's.
The magical thing about "Idiot Wind" is that both this version and the Bootleg version create differing aesthetics through the differences in vocal tone.
ReplyDeleteAs I get older the more contemplative (bootleg) version has the greater appeal - but if you're ever pissed off with someone the BOT version is good for a purge of discontent.
I find the Bootleg acoustic version more pointedly vicious. "Idiot Wind" is a fulminating raving hitting the female antagonist, the world, Dylan's audience, Dylan himself, everybody everywhere. The acoustic version is less sympathetic, more cruel, because Dylan seems in control of himself and his emotions.
ReplyDeleteI utterly disagree - the mood of the bootleg version is weariness, disillusionment and regret as opposed to the pointed viciousness of the BOT version.
DeleteBoth versions depict someone in control of their emotions - the poetry of the pointed lyrics are cruel knives which can only be sharped in such a way between those so intimate they know exactly how to dissect their intimate relationship. The manner in which they are intoned each time alters the emotional resonance.
The BOT version is someone at the height of bitterness where the passionate hatred is a pose to hide how much the singer is hurting, the bootleg version is the tail end where the passion is waning to the point where the final line is much more heartfelt, with a tone of resignation.
Just my interpretation though.
Regarding "Idiot Wind", I struggle to understand why songs which demonstrate (dramatically, to boot) hatred or contempt towards a female antagonist have to be called "misogynist". I mean, even if it had not featured the last "we are idiots", why should this rant be taken as directed to the whole of Womankind? It's as if one called "Masters of War" "misandrist".
ReplyDeleteI couldn't agree more. Sexual "equality" also implies equal responsibility and acceptance of blame (if and when blame is merited, at least).
Delete-- B.B. Fultz (not to be confused with the above anonymous, as anonymity can get confusing)
(P.S : what's up with this site lately George? When I reviewed Be Bop Deluxe I could sign on as me, and now I apparently cannot).
Seriously, am I the only one who thinks "Lily, Rosemary and the jack" a fine piece of music and, btw, the finest in bott? I totally stand for it, its story, melody and rythm really moves me.
DeleteI have always liked the song. It is a good contrast to the rest of the album, it is fun and has a nice hook. It should be at least 3 minutes shorter, but it is still good
DeleteI think Lily Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts is on this album because Bob just wanted to get at least one long epic story in. I dig the song's hook but it gets repetitive very quickly. Definitely prefer Hurricane.
ReplyDeleteA possible explanation for "Lily Rosemary"'s presence on this album (the one that keeps me from skipping it) is that it serves as an abstract representation of FRUSTRATION. Don't you get frustrated with the song, not seeming to have an obvious place on the album, not seeming to go anywhere with its story, repetitive as hell, doing the same mundane thing over and over, adding pointless verse after pointless verse as its NINE minutes tick by? I imagine Bob was feeling something like that at certain points during his disintegrating marriage, as well. (To be fair, I actually like the song; I like its vocal melody, its organ, its stupid bassline, and its silly hoedown tempo, though it's still only my tenth favorite song on the album.)
ReplyDelete