1) How Great Thou Art; 2) In The Garden; 3) Somebody Bigger Than You And I; 4) Farther Along; 5) Stand By Me; 6) Without Him; 7) So High; 8) Where Could I Go But To The Lord; 9) By And By; 10) If The Lord Wasnʼt Walking By My Side; 11) Run On; 12) Where No One Stands Alone; 13) Crying In The Chapel.
General verdict: Feels almost like the real thing — definitely as close to «true gospel» as the man would ever get. Who needs psychedelia when you have the King on your side?
Once again, context is everything. Surrounded
by the Kingʼs golden great rockʼnʼroll classics, this album would have probably
seemed underwhelming in comparison, particularly to a not particularly
religious conscience (like mine). But surrounded on both chronological sides
with Elvisʼ soundtrack fluff, How Great Thou
Art is not simply a breath of fresh air — it literally towers over all of
that crap as a genuine artistic masterpiece.
One thing is for sure: it is definitely the
most creative, curious, and deeply felt of his three gospel albums. The main
problem with His Hand In Mine was
that it was really a «gospel» album only on the surface: at heart, it was
really an album of sentimental crooning balladry — nice and well-meaning, but
way too slight to evoke a properly spiritual response. With this experience —
and let us not forget that it was actually Elvisʼ first proper new album in
five years — it feels as if the man had actually realized that himself, and
tried to rise up to the challenge of creating a true gospel experience this
time. With a brand new producer (Felton Jarvis), a set of tunes that Elvis mostly
picked out himself rather than had imposed on him, an actual gospel quartet joining
him for backup (The Imperials), and even a set of arrangements for traditional
tunes credited to Elvis Presley in person, he clearly wanted to make something
different, and he largely succeeded.
Even the track order matters here: instead of
being interspersed with each other as they were on His Hand In Mine, here the slow and solemn hymns are all put
together on the first side, while the fast and ruckus-raising spirituals are
confined to Side B. This creates a risk of bringing on monotonous boredom, but
it also eliminates the risk of «mood killing», and at least on the first side —
the most interesting one, if you ask me — the approach pays off well. Two
things are immediately noticeable — a huge
emphasis on keyboards, usually piano and more rarely organ, with far more
sophisticated and tempestuous arrangements than before; and a new sort of depth
and seriousness to Elvisʼ singing, as he goes lower than he has done in years,
generally refraining from sensual crooning and going for something more «earthy»,
if you know what I mean.
Of those six opening songs, the unhurried
waltzing of ʽFarther Alongʼ is my favorite — maybe because of the lyrics, whose
significance goes far beyond simplistic Christian conventions, or maybe because
somehow Elvis manages to turn it almost personal; it is interesting that if you
compare the song to other versions, from the Byrds all the way to Brad Paisley,
Elvisʼ one actually omits the
decisive third verse (basically the one that states how Jesus is going to solve
all your problems) and only includes the first two (listing the actual problems).
Whatever be the actual truth, the gut impression is that of a tired, exhausted,
but still deeply optimistic person quietly praying for alleviation — almost
like a veiled cry for help, which comes across as doubly significant if you are
aware of the context in which these sessions were held.
But there are other highlights, too. The title
track has an interesting construction, starting out without a rhythm section,
just wave upon wave of impressionistic piano playing and occasional
thunder-imitating drumrolls, then smoothly transitioning into another anthemic
waltz with huge booming choruses, subtly attenuated by an uncredited string
section. And ʽSomebody Bigger Than You And Iʼ may be seen as an early precursor
to Elvisʼ bigger-than-life, ʽSuspicious Mindsʼ et al. style, but still with
much more restraint than most of his Vegas-style material, probably because most
of the «pomp» is generated by the loudness of the Imperialsʼ backing vocals and
the mighty organ, rather than glitzy strings and horns.
The second side of the album, opening with the
fast-paced ʽSo Highʼ and rarely losing the tempo, is not as sonically
interesting, but you could still argue that there is more genuine rockʼnʼroll
energy and inspiration in songs like ʽSo Highʼ and ʽRun Onʼ than in all of the
manʼs soundtracks from the previous couple of years combined. ʽBy And Byʼ actually
features fuzzy electric guitar riffage (!), while ʽRun Onʼ (more commonly known
as ʽGodʼs Gonna Cut You Downʼ, but they probably wanted to avoid unnecessarily
violent connotations on the album sleeve) cannot exactly hope to compete with
the ground-shaking intensity of a Blind Willie Johnson, but still winds the man
up tighter and tenser than anything since the days of ʽReady Teddyʼ. ITʼS ALIVE!
Naturally, one should not get too excited: Elvis still hasnʼt become a
true gospel prophet, and there are one too many slow waltzing tempos on here to
insist that the gospel theme might be used here as just a vehicle for experimentation
and rejuvenation. And coming out with even a good gospel album in 1967, the
year of Sgt. Pepper, was hardly the
right move to re-establish a good working relation with the progressive critical
minds. Yet it is quite clear that here, for the second time in a row after the (very
relative) freshness of Spinout, was
something that the King did not need to be ashamed of — so, for all purposes,
we might as well consider that the manʼs actual «comeback» starts here, rather than with the «comeback
special» and In Memphis, even if we
would still have to deal with more soundtrack embarrassments in between.
IIRC, this album won the engineering Grammy over Sgt. Pepper's. Sounds weird but in those years the Grammy people probably valued clean, natural takes over studio wizardry.
ReplyDeleteWhew. I'm relieved you like this one. Okay, you are free to go back to criticizing the next few years of albums.
ReplyDelete