Friday, May 8, 2020

Elvis Presley: Fun In Acapulco

ELVIS PRESLEY: FUN IN ACAPULCO (1963)

1) Fun In Acapulco; 2) Vino, Dinero Y Amor; 3) Mexico; 4) El Toro; 5) Marguerita; 6) The Bullfighter Was A Lady; 7) (Thereʼs) No Room To Rhumba In A Sports Car; 8) I Think Iʼm Gonna Like It Here; 9) Bossa Nova Baby; 10) You Canʼt Say No In Acapulco; 11) Guadalajara; 12) Love Me Tonight; 13) Slowly But Surely.

General verdict: One excellent song, a couple nice moments, and an ocean of bland quasi-Mexican clichés from Elvis "El Toro" Presley, the Mariachi of Memphis.


With the Hawaiʼian subject explored to the very bottom, it was time to plunge Elvis into another, as of yet largely untapped pool of clichés and stereotypes — and so, welcome to Mexico, the land of mariachis, bullfighters, vino, dinero y amor. (Also rhumbas and bossa novas, though neither of the two is Mexican, but who cares as long as itʼs all somewhere south of Kansas?). The movie had Ursula Andress, the first and foremost Bond girl, as Elvisʼ love interest, which makes it very watchable for fans of Sixtiesʼ hotties. But the music, alas, features the exact same set of official composers — Tepper and Bennett at the forefront, followed by Weisman and Wayne, Bill Giant, Don Robertson, and precisely zero Latin American composers involved in the process, with the exception, of course, of the original composer of ʽGuadalajaraʼ, the only genuine Mexican song performed by Elvis in the movie.

Not that I am particularly offended by this next round of «cultural appropriation», since I am no more a fan of traditional Mexican music than of traditional Russian music, and from a purely aesthetic point of view, I donʼt know which one would be worse — having Elvis cover a bunch of authentic tunes or these cartoonish simulacra of the real thing, like the emotionally puffed-up heartbreaking tale of ʽEl Toroʼ or the fluffy moonlight serenade ʽYou Canʼt Say No In Acapulcoʼ. I guess this rendition of ʽGuadalajaraʼ is barely passable, but it does not even have the intentional comic value of the Beatles covering ʽBesame Muchoʼ — who really needs Elvis trying to step into the shoes of a Mexican mariachi?

Anyway, instead of trying to sum up everything that is wrong about the album (which is pretty much everything), let me instead try to be much more brief and sum up the few good things about it. First, ʽ(Thereʼs) No Room To Rhumba In A Sports Carʼ is one of the silliest innuendo-based tunes in the Elvis catalog — an obvious sexual joke, but at least it is a refreshing change of pace from all the other generic Latin American tropes, so thank you, Fred Wise and Dick Manning, for this piece of dirty clown action. Second, the two bonus tracks which were not part of the album, but tacked to the end upon the Colonelʼs insistence, are okay: ʽLove Me Tonightʼ is a decent piano ballad, not genius, but in the good old stripped-down tradition of ʽLove Me Tenderʼ etc., and ʽSlowly But Surelyʼ arguably marks the first appearance of fuzz guitar on an Elvis album — a blues-rocker whose start almost could be mistaken for a cover of ʽSmokestack Lightningʼ, though it does not truly progress anywhere beyond that.

Most importantly, of course, there is always the question of «that one song» on an Elvis album, and while It Happened At The Worldʼs Fair missed the mark, Fun In Acapulco does have ʽBossa Nova Babyʼ — another Leiber & Stoller classic, this time nicked from a year-old version by the Clovers. Stoller himself said he preferred the Clovers version, but there can be no serious objections against Elvisʼ cover, either. Itʼs fast, itʼs danceable, itʼs ironic and celebratory at the same time, itʼs got a pretty hot instrumental break, and it finds just the right tongue-in-cheek approach to tackle the clichés. It baffles me that no other songwriter here had managed to find a similar approach, but then, why should they when all the soft, mushy, cuddly, clichéd stuff was consistently found so acceptable by the industry people? At this point, people were flocking to the movies not so much to hear Elvis as to see him — the quality of the material used for the movie was far less relevant than the quality of the hairstyle. 

No comments:

Post a Comment