1) VROOOM; 2) Coda:
Marine 475; 3) Dinosaur; 4) Walking On
Air; 5) BʼBoom; 6) THRaK; 7) Inner Garden I; 8) People; 9) Radio I; 10) One
Time; 11) Radio II; 12) Inner Garden; 13) Sex Sleep Eat
Drink Dream; 14) VROOOM VROOOM; 15) VROOOM VROOOM: Coda.
General verdict: A slightly cellulitish variant of King
Crimson for the Grunge Age — but the mix of nostalgia with then-current
production trends still works fine for me.
No band has ever proven itself to be so
adaptable to each new musical time period as King Crimson has — that is, of
course, if we are talking intelligent adaptations that still allow the music to
be easily recognizable and identifiable, while at the same time reflecting and
honoring the most serious new musical developments of each period. But as
years, and decades, went by, adaptation to new musical developments became
harder — simply because it became harder to identify these new developments.
And it is not merely old age that has resulted in a lack of properly «iconic»
new albums from King Crimson past their third (or was that fourth?) traditional
resurrection. It is also the fact that in 1994-95, it was not exactly clear who
could serve as Frippʼs new source of inspiration. Last time we checked, it was
Talking Heads. But in the mid-1990s? Kurt Cobain? Black Francis? Alanis
Morissette?
Still, far be it from us to suggest that
Frippʼs brain cells might have gotten too rusty or confused in a period which
was, after all, more or less the very last hooray period for rock music in
general. On the formal scale, change was reflected in the adoption of a «Double
Trio» format — all the players from the Discipline
lineup were back, but now augmented with a second bassist (Trey Gunn, an actual
graduate of Frippʼs Guitar Craft school) and a second drummer (Pat Mastelotto);
apparently, Fripp had acquired this love for weird symmetries, or, perhaps, it
was just a part of his evil plan to tone down the presence and influence of
Bruford, who was almost supposed not
to be part of this new show, but allegedly shamed Robert into letting him back
in.
On the substantial scale, the very title of the
album (THRAK), as well as that of
the mini-album which preceded it with several alternate versions of the same
songs (VROOOM), already sort of
suggests something fairly brutal and violent — and while it would be pushing
things way too far to call this phase King Crimsonʼs «grunge period», I am
absolutely certain that the grunge and alt-rock explosion of the early 1990s
could not have gone unnoticed by the man who had already, to a large degree,
predicted the New Wave revolution, and to an even larger degree, embraced it
more wholeheartedly than any of his peers when it did come. In a way, THRAK is a synthesis of the heavy,
infernal math-rock of KCʼs Larksʼ
Tongues / Red period with the
polygonal futurism of their Discipline
era — you can think of it as a more structured and disciplined take on Larks or as a heavier, more metallic
take on Discipline, it works in both
directions. The problem is that when you are able to slap on such a precise
definition, the effect becomes predictable, and so THRAK no longer has the capacity of blowing your mind in the same
sudden ways as the three previous incarnations of King Crimson could.
Which is not to say that THRAK is not an excellent, consistent, thoroughly enjoyable set of
tunes for which I have the same type of love and admiration as, say, the
Stonesʼ Voodoo Lounge — we know very
well what to expect at this point, but there is still enough inspiration from
the general spirit of the times to keep on infecting you even 25 years later.
With the exception of a few minor transitional links, every major composition
on THRAK has plenty of energy, one
or more thick instrumental hooks, and tons of atmosphere. The doubled rhythm
sections make the songs seem lumpy and bulgy, but the professionalism of the
players gives them all the precision and agility of a raging hippo — or,
perhaps, a T-Rex would be a better analogy, given the title of one of the
albumʼs most memorable songs, to which we will be coming shortly.
The meat part of any KC album are always the
instrumentals, whose titles this time around bring on associations with Batman
comics or Jackie Chan movies more than anything else: ʽTHRAKʼ, ʽVROOOMʼ,
ʽBʼBoomʼ, ʽVROOOM VROOOMʼ (for all I know, they might be hidden acronyms, but
whoʼs crazy enough to want to find out?). And already the first one of these,
ʽVROOOMʼ, is an absolutely shameless variation on the melodic structure and
atmosphere of ʽRedʼ — one fanfare-like opening riff, one slowly winding main
riff, a quiet mid-section (though here, more than anywhere else, the jangly
geometry of Discipline is being
shown off), and then coming back around full circle for the coda. The riffs are
memorable and the band still pushes ahead with all the ferocity of a freshly
oiled old Panzer, but one listen to this track is also enough to understand why
THRAK will never be remembered with
the same sense of awe as its predecessors — as brutal as it may sound, the
level of self-plagiarism is through the roof here. That may have been the
intention — here we are, making up a new ʽRedʼ for a new generation of music
players and music listeners — but these intentions are limited by definition. I
actually think that the extended ʽCoda: Marine 475ʼ conclusion to the track is
more interesting — unlike the self-plagiarizing ʽRedʼ-based main body of
ʽVROOOMʼ, this part sounds more like a King Crimson attempt to put together the
codas of ʽI Am The Walrusʼ and ʽI Want You (Sheʼs So Heavy)ʼ and see what
happens when you give them the «double trio» treatment.
The impression does not change much when you go
through the rest of the instrumentals. Heavy echoes of ʽLarksʼ Tongues In
Aspicʼ (both parts), on one hand, and ʽThela Hun Ginjeetʼ and the like, on the
other, resonate all through ʽTHRAKʼ and particularly ʽVROOOM VROOOMʼ; only ʽBʼBoomʼ is different in that
it is mainly a skill show for the bandʼs percussionists, with a tribal jungle
sound that, for once, does not seem to have any direct analogies in KCʼs past —
but letʼs admit it, we have hardly come here with a primary goal of hearing
Bruford and Mastelotto play off each other for four minutes.
In the end, THRAKʼs main attraction are its vocal numbers — not entirely
original, either, but not as blatantly ripping off past frameworks as the
instrumentals. I suppose that Belew should be taking a lot of credit for these.
Over an entire decade separating Three
Of A Perfect Pair from THRAK,
Adrian had grown into a major solo artist in his own right, with four
first-rate albums of neo-Beatlesque pop under his belt, and although the base
aesthetics of King Crimson strictly prohibits him from sneaking any of those
blatantly pop melodies past Inspector Fripp, some of that classic Beatles
spirit, particularly its moody and psychedelic parts, still manage to get
smuggled in — see ʽPeopleʼ, for instance, with its ʽTomorrow Never
Knowsʼ-influenced backward guitar solos and ominously repetitive riff in the
coda (once again, highly reminiscent of ʽI Want Youʼ). On the other hand, even
Belew slips into formula every now and then: the gently dreamy ballad ʽWalking
On Airʼ borrows many elements from ʽMatte Kudasaiʼ, a fact that is hard to hide
even behind all the extra layers of guitar complexity that this new decade has
brought in. (Amusingly, its lyrics also make reference to "sheltering sky",
as if we really needed one more reminder of the greatness of Discipline).
Still, the album does contain two of my
favourite KC vocal numbers of all time. The already mentioned ʽDinosaurʼ
reflects Belewʼs usual eco-minded themes, though the lyrics are clever enough
to yield to both universal (inevitable extinction of man) and personal
(inevitable extinction of ME)
interpretation — what matters most, though, is the slow, lumbering, brooding
atmosphere, with lots of dry, creaky, sustained notes that make you picture
this very large, very old, very rusty entity that is nevertheless still
clinging to life with all the power it can muster, still strong enough to shoo
away all the petty youngsters.
Even more catchy — and more terrifying, when
you stop for long enough to truly ponder its symbolism — is ʽSex Sleep Eat
Drink Dreamʼ, the portrait of the human being as a simplistically programmed
genetic machine with severely limited functionality, hung high up on the nail
of one of the most distinctly memorable bass riffs in KC history and featuring
Belew in total meat zombie mode: "sex... sleep... eat... drink... dream...
sex... sleep... eat... drink... dream..." (listen closely and you will see
that only the word ʽdreamʼ in this chain is slightly drawn out, with a tiny bit
of tenderness involved — creepy, lately I have been noticing it too that dreaming is becoming the most enjoyable
part of my life). If the entire album is nowhere close to a masterpiece, ʽSex
Sleep Eat Drink Dreamʼ might arguably be the last properly great song in King Crimsonʼs entire catalog —
at least, it is definitely the last King Crimson song that has managed to etch
itself a permanent position in the back of my brain.
Summing up, I must point out that normally I
experience a sense of disappointment with albums like these — seeing great
artists clearly making an effort to progress and ultimately failing because
even the greatest ones have their natural limits. But despite its obvious
shortcomings, THRAK still holds up
as a positive, rather than pathetic, experience. It is an album that says to you, «my main goal is to tell you that
King Crimson are still alive and that they are aware that musical fashions have
shifted once again», but it is written and produced by people who still have
not run out of impressive riffs, catchy vocal melodies, and well-disciplined
collective energy to pull it all off with gusto. Fripp himself, as far as I
know, does not like to remember this period with too much fondness (probably
because he never thought reteaming with Belew and Bruford would be such a great
idea), and in the overall critical eye it also seems to somehow have slipped
through the cracks, but I think that in the general perspective, it was still
more innovative and creative than the Construkction
Of Light period, for instance. At the very least, like I said, it would be
a pity to have the 1990s, arguably the last properly creative decade for rock
music, to have remained without an actual King Crimson incarnation — and it
would be rash and silly to expect such an incarnation deliver anything better
than these results.
How come you suddenly don't like "One Time"? :-O Doesn't even get mentioned!
ReplyDeleteBeing a 1919-1974 (and 2014-2019) fan and not so much of the intervening years, I think this is a fair review.
ReplyDeleteBut you could have mentioned the athmosphere that permeates the album: they may be 'dinosaurs' by now, but they sure are committed dinosaurs, intending to go out with a bang!
"lately I have been noticing it too that dreaming is becoming the most enjoyable part of my life"
ReplyDeleteNone of my business George, but take care of yourself. Your reviews make my day a little better and I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels that way. I hope things improve soon. Apologies if I've misinterpreted
Thank you! No, you haven't misinterpreted, but good music helps.
DeleteI think you're correct about the "Matte Kudasai" comparison with "Walking on Air", but I think the more interesting comparison is the direct lift of key and ii-I chord progression from Lennon's "Don't Let Me Down". Having "Free As A Bird" flow directly into "Walking on Air" on one of the live records really drives home the Beatles link, and I doubt Fripp could've missed it.
ReplyDeleteAnd this isn't to badmouth Adrian in any way, "Walking On Air" has turned out to be one of my absolute favorite songs. A really excellent example of artistic reinterpretation.
Glad to have you back, George.