BARCLAY JAMES HARVEST: XII (1978)
1) Fantasy: Loving Is Easy; 2)
Berlin; 3) Classics: A Tale Of Two Sixties; 4) Turning In Circles; 5) Fact: The
Closed Shop; 6) In Search Of England; 7) Sip Of Wine; 8) Harbour; 9) Science
Fiction: Nova Lepidoptera; 10) Giving It Up; 11) Fiction: The Streets Of San
Francisco.
At least we now know that Barclay James Harvest
were definitely not deaf and blind to recent musical developments, including
that whole oddball «New Wave» thing — considering that the stern-marching bassline
that opens ʽLoving Is Easyʼ was lifted directly from ʽPsycho Killerʼ. (Perhaps
Lees just thought that there was no way the base audiences of BJH and Talking
Heads could have any overlap whatsoever — and he was probably right, too).
Unfortunately, where the bassline of ʽPsycho
Killerʼ flows quite naturally into the funky guitar riff, and the funky guitar riff
nicely tills the soil for the paranoid vocals, the bass in ʽLoving Is Easyʼ
does not even technically fit in with the rest of the song — it was stuck there
just for a flashy flourish, and this decision very neatly summarizes the main
flaw of BJH: a band that never stopped looking for ideas (not necessarily their
own ones), but ever so rarely had a good understanding of how to «set up» an
idea once it had been found.
It's not even that ʽLoving Is Easyʼ is that bad
an album opener — it's got a catchy Foreigner-style chorus, a vicious solo, a
perky-arrogant synthesizer tone... well, okay, it is pretty bad, because all of it is hardly enough to override the
confused amusement at John's salacious double-entendres. I mean, "...as I
shoot all my love into you"? "just get a hold and watch how it
grows"? I do not exactly remember anybody ordering a blue plate special à la AC/DC, although it is the Foreigner
comparison that is more appropriate here: sexist arena-pop with crude, stern
hooks and no sense of irony whatsoever. And leave it to a band as perplexed as
BJH to mix all that with the bassline of ʽPsycho Killerʼ.
If I have unintentionally made the song sound
more curious than it is, I apologize, because, in all actuality, XII is a fairly boring record. Those
who do seriously care about the second phase of poor Barclay's career will
probably still want to own it, and make it their last: after XII, Woolly, disgruntled with disproportionate
discrimination, finally quit the band and became free to pursue his own
Wagnerian-Mahlerian dreams in a solo career. But even as XII still sticks fairly close to the band's «progressive» or, at
least, «art» roots, it seems to run on an even smoother, less perceptible
railtrack than its predecessor. It is melodic, modestly complex, and rarely
indulges in huge lapses of taste, the biggest exceptions being the
aforementioned ʽLoving Is Easyʼ and ʽA Tale Of Two Sixtiesʼ, where, once again,
Lees puts on his old-and-worn Rock Guru Shoes and pours out a name-filled «baby-boomer
complaint» on the decline of rock music: apparently, "rock and roll died
with Easy Rider" and "I'm cutting out now before the New Wave takes
my surf board flair". (That's all fine, but why steal from David Byrne
then?).
On the formal side, the album is notable for
containing ʽBerlinʼ, a typically mushy Holroyd anthem that endeared the band
to the Germans so much, they would go on to sell most of their album stock in
that country — Les is honestly trying to come up with a McCartney-quality
ballad here, and it probably wouldn't be too cringeworthy if not for his elfish
voice, carrying such an overdose of sentimentalism that my emotional centers
immediately regurgitate the stuff.
It is also notable for an «encyclopaedic» twist
on Lees' part: all of John's songs are arranged in «library folders»
(ʽFantasyʼ, ʽClassicsʼ, ʽScience fictionʼ, etc.), to reflect the wide variety
of his interests and the genuine Renaissance nature of his character. This bold
artistic move is a little diluted, though, by the necessity of mixing his
material with that of Les and Woolly, both of whom refuse to play the game; and
by the rather loose adherence to the rules — for instance, why the hell is
ʽLoving Is Easyʼ placed under ʽFantasyʼ when it clearly should have been
labeled ʽAdultʼ (unless, of course, under «fantasy» we first and foremost
understand something like this)? And why
does he write such deadly boring «fiction» as ʽThe Streets Of San Franciscoʼ,
which closes the album with three minutes of a repetitive dark-descending-acoustic
coda with splutters of barely audible morose harmonica pasted over it for
consolation?
Overall, they seem to have succeeded in creating
a slightly darker, denser, more stylistically unified and, subsequently, less
memorable and «flashy» sequel to Gone To
Earth: Woolly went on record stating that he actually prefers XII (probably, among other things,
because they let him have two songs on it instead of the usual one — mercy gift
before the final breakup?), and in a way, so do I, because it does not at least
have a ʽPoor Man's Moody Bluesʼ on it. But that does not make it recommendable,
either: darkness and density aside, the music is still as limp and spineless as
ever — by this time, only a miracle could lift them out of this bog, and
Barclay James Harvest were a steady, self-assured band that never really
believed in miracles.
Check "XII" (CD) on Amazon
I don't think that Berlin is a bad song, at least it's memorable. I'm otherwise only familiar with their first album which I enjoy very much, but I listened to a greatest hits album of theirs the other day which seemed to heavily draw on their later albums and I thought almost all of it was indistinguishable mush. Berlin's melody was actually the only one I could remember and enjoy. Maybe it's sappy and sentimental, but there are worse songs.
ReplyDeleteWow George, you sure got more out of this album than I did -- though I agree with "spineless" & "boring." Thinking about mush like this too much will rot your brain. Keep the cover, throw the record away....
ReplyDelete