CELTIC FROST: COLD LAKE (1988)
1) Human II (intro); 2) Seduce
Me Tonight; 3) Petty Obsession; 4) (Once) They Were Eagles; 5) Cherry Orchards;
6) Juices Like Wine; 7) Little Velvet; 8) Blood On Kisses; 9) Downtown Hanoi;
10) Dance Sleazy; 11) Roses Without Thorns; 12*) Tease Me; 13*) Mexican Radio
(live).
Speak o' the devil: soon after the release of Into The Pandemonium, Celtic Frost
properly descended into pandemonium, quarreling between themselves and with
their record label. By 1988, the band had effectively disintegrated, yet real
warriors never die, so Tom ended up getting back his old drummer Stephen
Priestly, recruiting a new bass player (Curt Victor Bryant) and an extra guitar
player (Oliver Amberg), and leading the revamped Celtic Frost in yet another
direction — with thoroughly disastrous results.
Disastrous, but intriguing, that is. Skim
existing reviews for Cold Lake
superficially and you will get the impression that in 1988, Celtic Frost turned
into a glam metal band à la Mötley
Crüe or Poison. In fact, if you check any of their videos from that period
(e.g. for ʽCherry Orchardsʼ), or a bit of live tour footage, that impression is
easily confirmed — with lionine hair, makeup, garish garb, cocky choreography, and
smoke-a-rama-a-plenty, as long as you turn off the sound, they are pretty much
indistinguishable from the average glam metal outfit. Once you turn it on,
though, you are met with a weird, ugly, and quite idiosyncratic hybrid.
Glam metal, as we all know, was very much of a
commercial venture — essentially, those were simple pop songs played with heavy
metal guitars. On Cold Lake, Tom
Warrior and his new bandmates (which are now also responsible for contributing
much of the songwriting) certainly do not go pop: most of the riffs cannot be
qualified as hum-along earworms, and most of the gang choruses consist of
one-liners belted out by Tom ad nauseam. To this must be added the bizarre
effect of the vocals — while they have lost much of their black-metallic
devilish venom, they can never truly qualify as actual «singing. Put it this
way: on Morbid Tales, Tom Warrior
sounded like Satan with serious bowel issues, but on Cold Lake, he sounds more like a hobo — with even more serious
bowel issues. Unless the entire world were suffering from constipation and
wishing to empathize with the artist, there's totally no way this album could
be a resounding commercial success, ever; and there is not the slightest doubt
in my mind that Tom was perfectly aware of that when preparing the tracks for
public release.
So what the hell is this, then? After the brief
industrial-hip-hop-metal intro of ʽHuman IIʼ (already schizophrenic, eh?), the
first proper song is called ʽSeduce Me Tonightʼ, a suitable title for a power
ballad — except that the song is not a ballad at all, but more like a Judas
Priest-influenced rocker with big Eighties drums and those «hardcore» vocals
that would have probably sent Rob Halford flying for cover. Oh, and when it
comes to the instrumental break, Oliver Amberg delivers a Rambo-style shredding
solo that comes out of nowhere, disappears into nothing, and is only nominally
connected to the rest of the song. Meanwhile, the chorus, largely consisting of
the song title repeated over and over, sounds as if delivered by some stone
cold drunk biker to an inflatable doll, because no respectable hooker would
approach his piss-stained leather pants within a hundred feet.
And now, rinse and repeat ten times, because
this is the only formula for this
album. Yes, each and every one of the next tracks is comprised of precisely the
same ingredients. Sometimes a bit slower, sometimes a tad faster, they are all
built on similar (and usually unmemorable) riffage, gang choruses, and sloppy
shredding solos (sometimes devolving into series of obnoxious cherry bombs).
Considering the relative stylistic diversity of Pandemonium, such slavish adherence to such a bizarre holding
pattern is difficult to understand — but then again, the world of heavy metal
was a fairly confused world in the late Eighties, and if this was Tom's idea of
what a contemporary experimental approach to heavy music should sound like, I
guess it made more sense for 1988 than for any other year in the business.
We do not have to like it or appreciate it or
even respect it, but for the sake of honesty, we should not be lumping a unique
failed experiment like Cold Lake
together with the pop metal cash-cows of the era. The synthesis of NWoBHM
riffage, glam attitudes, and black metal ugliness was doomed from the start
because it made no sense and satisfied nobody; yet nobody could deny that
Celtic Frost were continuing their search for innovation, and that their
servile adoption of a new rigid formula for the entire record meant that they
desperately wanted it to work. Plus, Tom has to be commended for acknowledging
his own mistakes — after the album flopped, he has publicly disowned it and
admitted that it should have never seen the light of day (although he puts part
of the blame on producer Tony Platt, but it was not Tony Platt who wrote those riffs and sang those vocals).
Respecting that opinion, and getting fairly little enjoyment from the album
myself, I concur in a thumbs down rating here; but in a way, it only
boosts the reputation of Celtic Frost that their worst album ever also happens
to be one of the most artistically baffling albums made by a heavy metal band
in what might have been the defining decade for most of the subgenres of heavy
metal.
"Comprised of"? You're better than that, Professor!
ReplyDeleteI'll just refer you to this link:
Deletehttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/05/why-wikipedias-grammar-vigilante-is-wrong
So what you're inferring is that, irregardless, you could care less?
DeleteMisconception does not become truth because it is common. Did medieval England have a penalty "for unlawful carnal knowledge"? Did Einstein flunk his math classes?
I think that what makes this so irritating to me is that it's such a simple thing to get right. There is no context in which "comprised of" isn't used as if it were "composed of", so what conceivable reason is there to make the substitution?
DeleteWhat I am inferring is that, as every linguist knows and every non-linguist should know, language norms change over time, and that an enormous number of linguistic elements in every single modern language go back to "common misconceptions". If you want to avoid "common misconceptions" in English, you'd better start translating everything you write in the language of Beowulf (at least). Starting, for instance, with the totally misconceptional use of plural "you" for singular "thou". (By the way, isn't it irritating to you to say "you could care less" when the obviously logical choice is "you couldn't care less"?). Since "comprised of" is not my individual error (of the type that I do occasionally make), but reflects fairly common usage, the only logical choice is to assume that the new construction has its own internal logic, and live with it.
DeleteNow let's get back to Celtic Frost's "Cold Lake", shall we? What is your opinion on Tom Warrior's command of the English language?
Fair enough to leave it at that, but I would like to clarify that "inferring", "irregardless", and "could care less" were sarcasm (which I thought obvious in such density).
DeleteMr. Warrior's English, uh, suffices.
You ripped this album an asshole
ReplyDelete