BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN: WE SHALL OVERCOME: THE SEEGER SESSIONS (2006)
1) Old Dan Tucker; 2) Jesse
James; 3) Mrs. McGrath; 4) O Mary Don't You Weep; 5) John Henry; 6) Erie Canal;
7) Jacob's Ladder; 8) My Oklahoma Home; 9) Eyes On The Prize; 10) Shenandoah;
11) Pay Me My Money Down; 12) We Shall Overcome; 13) Froggie Went A Courtin'.
Was this inevitable? Bob Dylan entered his
«roots revival» stage in the early Nineties, having turned 50, and even though
many more people probably praised Good
As I Been To You and World Gone Wrong
than people who actually keep on listening to these records a quarter century
later, at least nobody will deny that they did help revitalize his artistically
sagging career and, in a way, prepared the ground for Time Out Of Mind. Springsteen enters that same stage comparatively
a little bit later (about five years or so), but a bigger difference is that,
unlike Dylan, Bruce never had an early folk-loving stage — his very first
albums were already influenced much more by Dylan himself than any of Dylan's
folk hero predecessors, and Bruce was never known all that much for covering
other people's songs, anyway.
But I do not think that, once the initial news
leaked out that Springsteen was recording a whole bunch of traditional folk
songs from the Pete Seeger songbook, anybody doubted that he could make these
tunes his own. I'd rather think that, perhaps, one could doubt whether he could
have preserved something of the old spirit of these songs — instead of just
Springsteen-izing them — and it is for this precise reason, arguably, that the
sessions were held not with the regular E Street Band, once again temporarily
put on hold, but with a bunch of new musicians from the New Jersey Area, not
at all well known but apparently well versed in traditional music. Acoustic
guitars, fiddles, banjos, old-timey percussion, the works. On top of that, one
major surprising addition are The Miami Horns, regularly sitting in on most of
the tracks and giving them a decidedly New Orleanian flavor — and on top of it
all, there's The Boss and his
well-worn raggedy voice, now perfectly adaptable to conveying that grizzly
folk spirit.
How does it work? Well, the biggest flaw of the
album is that it's almost predictably
good. Most likely, you already know many of these songs — and unless you just
hate the folk tradition as such, these are all fine examples of the genre. Most
likely, you already know how The Boss inspires his backing bands to play at
top energy level — and how well he can impersonate that proverbial Working Man,
taking his time on the front porch after a hard day's work to provide some
simple, unadorned musical joy for himself, his family, and his neighbors. Most
likely, you also know how The Boss is stubbornly resistant to musical fashions
(especially having learned his lesson with bad production in the Eighties), and
you know he is not going to rearrange
these songs as raves, raps, or metalcore. A project like this has a near-zero
probability of failure, and this is precisely what makes it not very exciting.
I don't even want to comment on any of the
songs individually, because most of them serve the same purpose: entertainment. This is not some sort of
sanctifying project where one turns the songs upside down and shows you the
interesting stuff in those little corners and pockets that you never saw there
before. These are big band arrangements for party halls and country fairs, to
which people simply dance the night away, regardless of whether the lyrics tell
bloody stories of Jessy James, Biblical parables, sailor sagas, or silly kid
tales of how Froggie went a-courtin'. This is why the tracks are long and
repetitive, and all the choruses are catchy because they are looped almost to
infinity — you're not really supposed to notice that, you're simply supposed to
keep on dancing, caught up in a rhythmic whirlwind. And the Boss is right
there, giving you a prime example of inexhaustible energy and passion. You stop
only when he stops, no earlier.
That said, I am still content to have this. The
brass arrangements of the material are somewhat of a novelty, yet they work —
giving the songs an extra «cabaret» flavor, perhaps, but one that does not feel
alien to the material. And if you want to hear those old-timey numbers played
with gusto, with as much bravado, volume, and recklessness as possible, I'd be
hard pressed to come up with a better candidate than The Seeger Sessions — Bruce never relents, and on songs like
ʽJacob's Ladderʼ or ʽO Mary Don't You Weepʼ, you can almost feel him pushing,
pushing, pushing the band to further heights of passion with each new reprisal
of the chorus. Subtlety is not a welcome guest on the record; subtlety is left
over to the real Pete Seeger, or the likes of The Country Gentlemen. Here,
it's all about going wild, and who's better at going wild than Springsteen? And
at the tender age of 55, too, it's like the perfect balance between being old
enough to lend some spirit of authenticity here, but young enough to still be
able to kick up a good ruckus.
This does not conceal the fact that the record
is lightweight, and in general more of a temporary amusement for Springsteen
rather than a serious project — but clearly, the man has earned a right to some
lightweight detours, and paying tribute to a musical genre without which your musical genre would not exist in
the first place may be the best choice for such a lightweight detour. I will
probably refrain from an explicit thumbs up here, because after the first few
songs, the predictability effect becomes so strong that tediousness begins to
set in; however, I will never say that the album is completely expendable,
either — at the very least, it is a meaningful chapter in the Springsteen book,
if not necessarily a meaningful milestone in the art of folk music revival.
"who's better at going wild than Springsteen?"
ReplyDeleteIs that a serious question? To check what you mean I just listened to Jacob's Ladder - the first two minutes or so. Nice, catchy, cheerful, even energetic - but about as wild as my crippled grandparents. That says nothing about the quality of the song - but even now I'm almost 52 "wild" is about the last label I would attach to it.
The second movement of Shostakovich' Viola Sonata (written when he was almost 70) is wilder than anything Springsteen ever wrote.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBlRq0850Og
Why this example?
Folk theme of course.
What no Purple? No Heep? Surely SQ has some old folk covers with all them blooze. And isn't Blackmores Night the English equivalent of this?
DeleteThis is a strange comment. Obviously, the reference is to the folk / folk-rock genre, not to heavy rock or to music in general. Obviously, we are not talking about "writing" but about arranging and performing, so comparing Springsteen and Shostakovich makes no sense whatsoever. Lastly, it makes no sense to listen to two minutes of 'Jacob's Ladder', because its tension increases as the song goes by.
DeleteBlackmore's Night, by the way, is not comparable to this - these are rough-shod, hard-drinking folk stompers. Blackmore's Night go for gallant fantasy, not barroom aura, even when they drag you in their merry-go-round.
For real "wildness" in similar vein (big-band, cabaret-like rearrangements of folk music), go no further than Bellowhead--who are one of the most exciting things in the English folk scene right now, and are just as revolutionary as Fairport Convention were back in the day.
ReplyDeleteI do love Springsteen's version of "Old Man Tucker." He sounds like he's having such a great time singing it that it's infectious. And one band member is playing what sure sounds like either a kazoo or comb and tissue paper, which feels rather endearingly down-home.
ReplyDeleteBut yes, I don't have much desire to listen to a whole album in this vein.
uriah heep... what an awesome, wild band
ReplyDeleteI saw Uriah Heep open for Cheap Trick in 1982...when I saw the Spinal Tap movie two years later, I felt a sense of deja vu.
DeleteWhen we brought our baby son home, a friend of my wife's gave us a copy of this for him. "There's no good reason why kids's music can't be good music", she said. Well, when my son got a little older he just love singing along to stuff like "Pay Me Money Down", "Old Dan Tucker" and "Buffalo Gals" (a bonus track on our copy). And when he decides to be serious, I'd rather hear him tackle stuff like "We Shall Overcome" and "Eyes of the Prize" than all of "..Tom Joad" or "D&D". Interestingly, my son enjoyed Bruce's renditions far more the Peter, Paul and Mary's versions of the same or similar material, which he found boring. Bruce puts much more passion and energetic fun in the material. But, yeah, serious folk scholar won't be wowed by this.
ReplyDelete